Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

AI Agent Reliability in 2025: Failure Modes and Success Rates of Long-Horizon Tasks

Posted on July 10, 2026July 11, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21306168  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI94%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,620✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,620
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21306168
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]87%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 87%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid expansion of autonomous AI agents capable of executing multi-step tasks has highlighted the need for rigorous reliability assessment. While benchmark suites such as SWE-bench, GAIA, and OSWorld provide preliminary success metrics, they lack a unified framework for characterizing failure modes across heterogeneous agent architectures. This article addresses this gap by presenting a sys...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21306168 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI94%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,620✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,620
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21306168
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]87%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 87%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

Cryptocurrency-Enabled Shadow Economies: On-Chain Analytics for Illicit Flow Detection

Posted on July 10, 2026July 10, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21299476  59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI97%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References31 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,358✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21299476
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The increasing adoption of cryptocurrency has facilitated the emergence of shadow economies that operate beyond traditional regulatory frameworks. Detecting illicit flow patterns within blockchain transactions is critical for financial compliance and risk assessment. This article addresses the following research questions: (RQ1) How can on-chain analytics be leveraged to identify shadow economy...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21299476 59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI97%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References31 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,358✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21299476
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

AI Contract Programming: Preconditions, Postconditions, and Invariants for Agentic Systems

Posted on July 9, 2026July 10, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21286167  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]804✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 804
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21286167
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Designing reliable AI agents requires precise specification of behavioral expectations. This article investigates how Design‑by‑Contract (DbC) principles can be adapted to formally express preconditions, postconditions, and invariants that remain robust across model updates and prompt drift. We outline a pattern repertoire for encoding contracts in a machine‑readable format, and demonstrate how...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21286167 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]804✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 804
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21286167
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Cost Optimization: Vector DB vs Sparse Retrieval Economics

Posted on July 9, 2026July 9, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21280142  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources8%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,587✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,587
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21280142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]83%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 83%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine large language models with external knowledge sources to mitigate hallucination and improve factual accuracy. However, the economic cost of RAG—particularly when scaling vector databases versus sparse retrieval pipelines—remains insufficiently characterized. This article investigates the cost-performance trade‑offs of two dominant RAG back‑en...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21280142 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources8%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,587✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,587
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21280142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]83%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 83%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

AI Wage Premium Evidence: Measuring Productivity Uplift and Salary Effects in Knowledge Work

Posted on July 8, 2026July 9, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21270839  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]926✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 926
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21270839
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in knowledge-intensive industries has sparked debate about its impact on compensation structures and wage inequality. This article investigates whether AI tools increase or decrease salary differentials across skill levels and firm sizes, focusing on empirical evidence from firms with high AI penetration. We pose three research que...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21270839 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]926✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 926
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21270839
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Sanctions Intelligence Automation: AI-Driven Screening at Scale Under EU and US Regimes

Posted on July 8, 2026July 8, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21266399  57stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI69%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic77%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,370✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,370
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21266399
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Accurate and efficient sanctions screening is a critical compliance requirement for financial institutions operating across the European Union and United States. While rule‑based systems dominate current workflows, recent advances in neural representation l[REDACTED]g offer the prospect of dramatically reducing false‑positive rates and operational costs. This article investigates the deployment...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21266399 57stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI69%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic77%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,370✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,370
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21266399
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

The Shadow IT AI Layer: Unauthorized Copilot and ChatGPT Usage in the Capability Gap

Posted on July 7, 2026July 8, 2026 by
Gap Research
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The diffusion of generative AI copilots such as Microsoft Copilot and OpenAI ChatGPT has produced a new class of unsanctioned employee tool usage—commonly labeled shadow AI. This article provides a systematic quantification of shadow AI adoption across Fortune 500 enterprises and evaluates its net effect on the organizational capability gap. Employing a mixed‑methods design that integrates a la...

Show moreHide
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Capability-Adoptio…Read More
Read more

Readability and Conceptual Depth Metrics for AI Research Content: Beyond Flesch-Kincaid

Posted on July 7, 2026July 7, 2026 by
Quality Research
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed6%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic94%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,172✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,172
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid proliferation of AI‑generated text in scholarly and professional contexts demands robust, multidimensional evaluation tools that go beyond traditional readability formulas such as Flesch‑Kincaid. This article introduces a composite quality metric that integrates four independent dimensions: (1) surface‑level readability, (2) conceptual density, (3) argumentative coherence, and (4) exp...

Show moreHide
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed6%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic94%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,172✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,172
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Article Quality Sc…Read More
Read more

Manufacturing AI Observability: Predictive Maintenance Explanation Quality

Posted on July 7, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI98%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References48 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,191✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,191
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability in AI-driven predictive maintenance remains a critical but under‑quantified factor in industrial deployments. This article investigates how the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated explanations affect maintenance decision outcomes in large‑scale manufacturing environments. We define explanation quality along three dimensions—clarity, fidelity, and actionable insight—and const...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI98%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References48 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,191✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,191
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI ObservabilityRead More
Read more

Supply Chain Attacks on ML Models: Poisoning, Backdoors, and Trojan Detection in Open Weights

Posted on July 6, 2026July 6, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007  53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,318✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,318
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Supply chain attacks targeting machine l[REDACTED]g (ML) pipelines have emerged as a critical threat vector, compromising model integrity through poisoning, backdoor insertion, and Trojan triggers embedded in ostensibly benign training data. This article systematically reviews the state of the art in model poisoning attack vectors within open-source ML ecosystems, focusing on Hugging Face Hub a...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007 53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,318✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,318
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 54
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • From Black Box to Governance Dashboard: Integrating Explainability Metrics into Model Lifecycle Management
  • Energy Transparency in Open-Source AI: Training Carbon Footprints and Power Consumption Reporting Standards
  • Foundation Model Commoditization: How API Parity Is Reshaping the AI Stack in 2025
  • Shadow Banking Detection with Graph Neural Networks: Mapping Unofficial Lending Networks
  • Structured Prompting as Executable Specification: DSLs for Reliable LLM Behavior

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

530+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.