Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

The 2025 AI Safety Landscape: Mechanistic Interpretability Results and Their Practical Implications

Posted on July 21, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21472163  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted82%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI73%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,144✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,144
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21472163
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Mechanistic interpretability has emerged as a cornerstone for ensuring the safe deployment of increasingly capable AI systems. In this paper we synthesize the most influential advances from 2024 through 2026, focusing on sparse autoencoders, activation patching, and circuit analysis as three paradigmatic lenses for e[REDACTED]sing hidden decision-making processes in neural networks. We formulat...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21472163 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted82%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI73%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,144✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,144
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21472163
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Closing the Loops: Real-Time Feedback Mechanisms for Adaptive AI Governance in 2025

Posted on July 21, 2026July 22, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21485746  63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,831✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,831
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21485746
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Artificial intelligence systems deployed in high-stakes enterprise environments require continuous monitoring to ensure compliance with operational risk thresholds. Traditional static thresholding approaches often fail to adapt to evolving data distributions, leading to either excessive false positives or delayed detection of critical anomalies. This article investigates real-time feedback mech...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21485746 63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,831✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,831
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21485746
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI ObservabilityRead More
Read more

Community Governance of Foundation Models: Lessons from Linux, Apache, and Kubernetes Applied to AI

Posted on July 20, 2026July 21, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21479259  61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI95%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed16%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,357✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,357
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21479259
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]39%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 39%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (78 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Foundation models (FMs) are increasingly centralized, prompting interest in open-source governance analogues from mature software ecosystems such as Linux, Apache, and Kubernetes. This article investigates which open-source governance models—foundation, stewardship, and meritocracy—are being adopted for AI projects and whether they provide adequate mechanisms for safety and quality assurance. W...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21479259 61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI95%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed16%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,357✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,357
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21479259
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]39%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 39%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (78 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

AI in Customs Fraud Detection: Benchmarking Neural Approaches to Invoice Manipulation

Posted on July 20, 2026July 20, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21461071  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted86%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,579✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,579
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21461071
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The digitization of global trade has intensified the need for automated fraud detection mechanisms within customs environments. While neural network architectures have shown promise for identifying manipulative invoice patterns, systematic benchmarks comparing their performance across distinct fraud typologies are lacking. This article presents a comparative evaluation of four state‑of‑the‑art ...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21461071 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted86%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,579✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,579
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21461071
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

Formal Verification of RAG Pipeline Correctness: TLA+ and Alloy Models for Retrieval Systems

Posted on July 19, 2026July 20, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21451205  53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI56%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]460✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 460
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21451205
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

We investigate formal verification of Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipelines, focusing on correctness properties such as freshness, deduplication, and completeness. Using TLA+ and the Alloy modeling language, we define invariants and demonstrate verification of a production RAG service [1] [2].

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21451205 53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI56%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]460✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 460
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21451205
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Edge AI Deployment Economics: On-Device Inference vs Cloud Round-Trip at Scale

Posted on July 19, 2026July 19, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21441658  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI40%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,013✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,013
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21441658
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Edge AI is reshaping real-time analytics across IoT, mobile, and on-premise environments, yet practitioners lack a unified cost model that captures the full spectrum of trade-offs. This article quantifies the economic implications of on-device inference versus cloud round‑trip inference at scale, integrating connectivity costs, latency requirements, and data‑sovereignty constraints. We introduc...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21441658 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI40%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,013✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,013
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21441658
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

AI-Driven Market Concentration: Measuring Oligopoly Risk in Foundation Model Economics

Posted on July 18, 2026July 18, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21434928  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef7%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]650✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 650
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21434928
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Foundation models are increasingly central to digital economies, yet their market structure remains sparsely quantified. This article asks how economic dynamics of winner‑take‑all markets manifest in the foundation‑model sector, what barriers to entry shape competitive equilibrium, and how switching costs influence firm behavior. We address these questions through a three‑pronged empirical stra...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21434928 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef7%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]650✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 650
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21434928
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

AI-Assisted Treaty Monitoring: From Arms Control to Export Compliance Verification

Posted on July 18, 2026July 18, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21430730  52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic89%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]426✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 426
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21430730
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Treaty monitoring traditionally relied on manual reviews of satellite archives, customs ledgers, and financial disclosures. Recent pilots in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Financial Action Task Force show how AI can process petabytes of data to surface anomalous patterns quickly. This article investigates AI pipelines that support modern treaty verification and addresses three r...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21430730 52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic89%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]426✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 426
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21430730
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

AI Adoption Latency Benchmarks: Time-to-Value Across Industry Verticals in 2025

Posted on July 17, 2026July 18, 2026 by
Gap Research
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21421816  67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,199✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,199
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21421816
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]75%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 75%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly viewed as a strategic lever for value creation, yet organizations struggle to translate experimental projects into measurable returns on investment (ROI). This article investigates the latency — defined as the elapsed time from project approval to the first observable quantifiable benefit — across four major industry verticals: financial services, lo...

Show moreHide
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21421816 67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,199✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,199
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21421816
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]75%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 75%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Capability-Adoptio…Read More
Read more

Human-AI Co-Authorship Impact on Research Quality: Citation Rates and Retraction Analysis

Posted on July 17, 2026July 17, 2026 by
Quality Research
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21414377  68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources21%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted96%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef21%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access96%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,402✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,402
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21414377
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]17%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 17%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (79 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The integration of artificial intelligence tools into scholarly workflows has transformed how research is conducted, disseminated, and evaluated [1] [1]. Among the most visible manifestations of this shift is the emergence of human-AI co-authorship, where AI systems contribute substantively to the intellectual content of academic papers [2] [2]. This phenomenon raises critical questions about r...

Show moreHide
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21414377 68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources21%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted96%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef21%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access96%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,402✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,402
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21414377
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]17%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 17%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (79 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Article Quality Sc…Read More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 54
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • From Black Box to Governance Dashboard: Integrating Explainability Metrics into Model Lifecycle Management
  • Energy Transparency in Open-Source AI: Training Carbon Footprints and Power Consumption Reporting Standards
  • Foundation Model Commoditization: How API Parity Is Reshaping the AI Stack in 2025
  • Shadow Banking Detection with Graph Neural Networks: Mapping Unofficial Lending Networks
  • Structured Prompting as Executable Specification: DSLs for Reliable LLM Behavior

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

530+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.