1 Odesa National Polytechnic University (ONPU)
- Type
- Academic Textbook
- Status
- Complete · 14 chapters · 2025–2026
- Tool
- Data Mining Method Selector
This comprehensive academic textbook presents a structured taxonomy of data mining methods, algorithms, and real-world applications spanning business, healthcare, finance, and scientific research. Organized across fourteen chapters in five thematic parts, the work surveys foundational concepts, core methodologies (supervised and unsupervised learning), advanced techniques (deep learning, time series, text mining), and industry-specific implementations. Written in an accessible yet rigorous style, each chapter combines descriptive explanations with formal taxonomies and practical case studies, making the material relevant to data scientists, practitioners, and researchers seeking both theoretical understanding and methodological frameworks for intelligent data analysis.
Idea and Motivation
Data mining as a discipline sits at a critical juncture: the foundational methods are well-established, yet the landscape of applications continues to expand rapidly across industries and scientific domains. Academic literature tends to fragment into specialized subfields—machine learning theory, business analytics, bioinformatics, social network analysis—each with its own terminology, assumptions, and publication venues. Practitioners, meanwhile, face a practical challenge: how do you select the right method for a specific problem when the literature is scattered across hundreds of papers, conferences, and domain-specific textbooks?
This research series began with a straightforward observation: what the field needs is not another incremental method, but a comprehensive, coherent taxonomy. A structured map of the data mining landscape that covers not only the methods themselves but their relationships, trade-offs, preconditions, and contexts of application. A textbook written for thinking practitioners—one that teaches not just techniques, but how to think about choosing and applying them.
Goal
The series aims to construct a unified, narrative-driven textbook that serves as a reference for data mining taxonomy, methods, and applications. Rather than focusing on any single algorithm or technique, the goal is to map the entire methodological space: where each approach sits in relation to others, what problems it solves, what assumptions it requires, and what trade-offs it entails. The textbook is designed to be readable as a coherent argument—telling the story of how data mining evolved, how methods cluster into families, and how industries have adapted these methods to their specific contexts.
A secondary goal is to create an open-source tool—the Data Mining Method Selector—that makes the taxonomy interactive and practical. Researchers and practitioners can use it to navigate the decision space: identify relevant methods for their problem, understand prerequisite concepts, and access links to implementations and further reading.
Scope
The textbook spans fourteen chapters organized in five parts covering the full spectrum of data mining:
| Part | Focus Area | Key Topics |
|---|---|---|
| I | Foundations (Ch. 1–3) | Historical evolution, fundamental concepts, data mining definitions, relationship to statistics and machine learning |
| II | Core Methods (Ch. 4–7) | Supervised learning (classification, regression), unsupervised learning (clustering, association rules), feature engineering, model selection and validation |
| III | Advanced Techniques (Ch. 8–10) | Deep learning architectures, time series forecasting and anomaly detection, text mining and NLP |
| IV | Industry Applications (Ch. 11–13) | Healthcare (patient stratification, outcome prediction), finance (credit risk, fraud detection), e-commerce (recommendation systems, churn prediction) |
| V | Frontiers (Ch. 14) | Ethical data mining, privacy-preserving techniques, emerging challenges and open research directions |
Focus
The pedagogical approach emphasizes conceptual clarity and methodological decision-making. Rather than deriving every algorithm from first principles, the textbook focuses on: (1) taxonomic structure—how methods relate to each other and cluster into families; (2) preconditions and applicability—what assumptions each method requires, what types of data it handles, what scale it reaches; (3) trade-offs—accuracy versus interpretability, training time versus inference time, theoretical guarantees versus empirical performance; (4) real-world context—how methods are adapted in practice, where theory meets constraint.
Storytelling is intentional. Each chapter opens with a problem or historical narrative, progresses through the conceptual and methodological layers, and concludes with case studies or research gaps. This approach is designed to engage readers at multiple levels: practitioners seeking a decision framework, researchers identifying open questions, and students building intuition alongside formal knowledge.
Limitations
Scientific Value
The series contributes to the field in three distinct ways. First, it provides a comprehensive, structured taxonomy of data mining methods—filling a gap in the literature for an integrated, narrative-driven reference that treats methods across their full ecosystem rather than in isolated silos. Second, it advances pedagogy: the storytelling approach combined with formal taxonomy makes complex material accessible without sacrificing rigor, potentially influencing how data mining and machine learning are taught. Third, it documents the current state of applied data mining across major industries, capturing not just which methods are used, but why, under what constraints, and with what adaptations.
The Data Mining Method Selector tool represents a direct research artifact—an open-source resource that makes the taxonomy interactive and decision-ready for practitioners worldwide.
Resources
- Data Mining Method Selector Tool→
- Zenodo Collection→
- GitHub Repository→
- Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487→
Status
Complete. 14 chapters published. Last updated: March 2026. The textbook forms a coherent, self-contained research corpus. No further chapters are planned; however, the Data Mining Method Selector and supporting materials will be maintained and updated as new methods and applications emerge.
Contribution Opportunities
Researchers and practitioners wishing to build on this work are invited to engage with the following directions:
- Methodological extensions: Add new chapters or case studies covering emerging methods (causal inference, federated learning, neurosymbolic systems) or vertical applications (agriculture, energy, climate science).
- Method Selector expansion: Contribute decision trees, criteria sets, and implementations for additional methods via the GitHub repository.
- Industry case studies: Document how organizations have applied data mining methods under real-world constraints. We welcome anonymized case study submissions.
- Educational adaptations: Develop course modules, tutorial videos, or lab assignments based on textbook chapters. Contact the authors for collaboration.
- Cross-domain research: Apply the taxonomy to emerging domains (generative AI integration, multimodal data mining, real-time streaming analytics) and document findings.
Published Articles
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 50% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 75% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 8% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 92% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 25% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 12 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,938 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,938 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749494 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 8% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 42% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 75% | ○ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 67% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 58% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 42% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 12 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 5,898 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,898 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 50% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 83% | ✓ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 8% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 42% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 12 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 5,729 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,729 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749485 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 7% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 4 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 0% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 80% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 0% | ○ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 0% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 80% | ✓ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 10% | ○ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 90% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 10 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,502 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,502 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665633 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 5 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 0% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 0% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 1 refs | ○ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 2,293 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,293 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18626630 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 100% | ✓ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 5 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 54% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 92% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 46% | ○ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 42% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 50% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 85% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 38% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 26 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,750 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,750 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18648774 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 4% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 7 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 7 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 78% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 96% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 83% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 83% | ✓ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 17% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 83% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 17% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 23 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,575 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,575 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18648782 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 0% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 0% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 1 refs | ○ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 5,081 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,081 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18666030 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 100% | ✓ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 73% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 81% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 78% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 19% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 24% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 37 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 5,725 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,725 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18672455 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 3% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 81% | ✓ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 93% | ✓ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 7% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 93% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 15% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 27 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,607 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,607 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18683667 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 4% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 5 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 72% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 97% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 88% | ✓ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 6% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 31% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 32 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 6,126 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 6,126 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18701939 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 3% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 6 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 79% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 98% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 98% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 64% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 12% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 98% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 21% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 42 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 3,165 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,165 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18725773 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 15% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 84% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 83% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 18% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 8% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 84% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 68% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 96 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 2,743 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,743 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18725775 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 48% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 93% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 91% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 45% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 14% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 91% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 43% | ○ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 56 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 4,008 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,008 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18725779 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 0% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 0% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 0% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 100% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 2 refs | ○ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 2,044 | ✓ | Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,044 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998582 |
| [o] | ORCID [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed [REQ] | — | ✗ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness [REQ] | 33% | ✗ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 0 | ○ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0 |
| [g] | Code | — | ○ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |