Category: Geopolitical Risk Intelligence

Data-driven political and economic risk predictions. Monitoring public databases, historical analysis, and predictive modeling for community safety.

AI-Augmented Diplomatic Forecasting: Using Predictive Analytics to Model State Intentions in Crisis Scenarios

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22649193  33stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]618✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 618
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22649193
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The topic of $DESCRIPTION has gained significant attention in recent years. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of $DESCRIPTION, focusing on its implications for the AI industry. We begin by outlining the background and motivation for this study.

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22649193 33stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]618✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 618
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22649193
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Resilience Forecasting for AI-Enabled Critical Networks: Predicting Cascading Failures Under Adversarial Stress

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22344805  31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]122✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 122
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22344805
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

Introduction Builds stochastic models to anticipate failure propagation in supply chains and communication grids when AI components are compromised.

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22344805 31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]122✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 122
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22344805
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Geopolitical Risk Scoring Bias: Auditing AI Models for Systematic Regional Skew

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22258926  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References3 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]435✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 435
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22258926
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The topic of Geopolitical Risk Scoring Bias: Auditing AI Models for Systematic Regional Skew represents a significant area of inquiry in contemporary AI research. This article examines Geopolitical Risk Scoring Bias: Auditing AI Models for Systematic Regional Skew through a comprehensive lens, addressing its theoretical foundations, practical implementations, and broader implications. Presents ...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22258926 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References3 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]435✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 435
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22258926
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Hybrid Warfare Signal Intelligence: AI for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation in Critical Infrastructure

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22164310  27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted33%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic33%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References3 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22164310
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

\n

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22164310 27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted33%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic33%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References3 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22164310
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

AI-Driven Sanction Evasion Detection: Real-Time Monitoring of Illicit Financial Flows

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22053107  65stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI96%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,927✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,927
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22053107
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Financial sanctions administered by state actors now target algorithmic laundering channels that dynamically reshape network topology. This paper investigates automated detection of sanction evasion through machine l[REDACTED]g, focusing on three core questions:

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22053107 65stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI96%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,927✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,927
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22053107
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

AI in Conflict Zone Logistics: Autonomous Supply Chain Optimization Under Adversarial Conditions

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21893428  57stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI69%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,828✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,828
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21893428
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Autonomous supply chain optimization in conflict-adjacent environments presents unique challenges characterized by adversarial interference, dynamic demand fluctuations, and humanitarian constraints. This article investigates the performance of three algorithmic frameworks—reinforcement l[REDACTED]g-based routing, graph neural network forecasting, and mixed‑integer programming optimization—unde...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21893428 57stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI69%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,828✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,828
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21893428
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Information Operations Detection: NLP Models for Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior at Scale

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21828644  21stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted11%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic11%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access17%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,014✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,014
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21828644
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]6%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 6%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) on social media presents a growing challenge for platform integrity, public discourse, and democratic processes[1]. Recent empirical investigations have demonstrated that malicious actors can amplify false narratives through synchronized account activity, content amplification, and strategic narrative framing[2][3]. While detection frameworks based on netw...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21828644 21stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted11%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic11%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access17%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,014✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,014
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21828644
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]6%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 6%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Space Domain Awareness: AI for Satellite Activity Monitoring and Anti-Satellite Threat Detection

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21767438  55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic78%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,097✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,097
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21767438
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]13%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 13%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (57 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid militarization of orbital space has created an urgent need for automated monitoring of satellite behavior. This article presents a comprehensive AI-driven framework for space domain awareness, focusing on satellite activity monitoring and anti-satellite threat detection. We introduce a multi-modal deep l[REDACTED]g architecture that integrates orbital telemetry, optical imaging, and r...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21767438 55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic78%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,097✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,097
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21767438
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]13%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 13%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (57 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Biosecurity Risk Intelligence: AI Models for Pandemic Preparedness and Dual-Use Research Monitoring

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21699145  31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]737✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 737
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21699145
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

Pandemic preparedness requires early detection of biological threats through sophisticated AI systems analyzing global health data, genomic sequences, and research activity. This article surveys AI models deployed for pandemic signal detection and dual-use biological research monitoring, evaluating their prediction accuracy, false positive management, and operational integration challenges. We ...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21699145 31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]737✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 737
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21699145
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

AI-Powered Economic Warfare: Sanctions Evasion Detection in Cross-Border Transactions

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21626136  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,583✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,583
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21626136
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Economic sanctions have become a central instrument of geopolitical policy, yet enforcement agencies repeatedly encounter sophisticated evasion schemes that exploit layered corporate structures, blended finance, and digital asset ecosystems. Traditional rule‑based screening tools struggle with the combinatorial explosion of transaction pathways and the adaptive nature of illicit networks. Machi...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21626136 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,583✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,583
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21626136
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more