Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Cross-Layer KV-Cache Sharing

Posted on March 28, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed30%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]76%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 76%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models (LLMs) scale to billions of parameters and context windows stretch beyond 128K tokens, the key-value (KV) cache becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during inference. Cross-layer KV-cache sharing represents a family of techniques that exploit redundancy in key and value representations across transformer layers to reduce cache memory without retraining. This article i...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed30%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]76%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 76%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

VAT Gap Estimation for Ukraine: Methodology and Cross-Country Comparison

Posted on March 28, 2026March 28, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19281632  32stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted12%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI29%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed18%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access71%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,469✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,469
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19281632
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (21 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

The value-added tax (VAT) compliance gap represents the difference between theoretical VAT liability and actual VAT revenue collected, serving as a primary quantitative indicator of tax evasion and shadow economic activity. This article examines the methodological landscape for VAT gap estimation, applies a comparative framework to Ukraine's fiscal context, and benchmarks Ukrainian VAT performa...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19281632 32stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted12%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI29%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed18%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access71%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,469✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,469
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19281632
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (21 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

Multi-Scenario Stress Testing for HPF-P Pharmaceutical Portfolios

Posted on March 28, 2026March 28, 2026 by
Framework Research
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19273234  67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources73%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted73%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef73%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed73%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,652✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,652
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19273234
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]83%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 83%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Pharmaceutical portfolio management operates under persistent uncertainty from supply chain disruptions, regulatory shifts, and demand volatility. While the HPF-P framework provides Decision Readiness Index (DRI) and Decision Readiness Level (DRL) metrics for portfolio assessment, their behavior under extreme stress conditions remains uncharacterized. This article develops a multi-scenario stre...

Show moreHide
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19273234 67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources73%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted73%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef73%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed73%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,652✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,652
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19273234
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]83%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 83%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
HPF-P FrameworkRead More
Read more

Token Pruning and Attention Sparsity

Posted on March 28, 2026March 28, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources75%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access88%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]92%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 92%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

This article investigates token pruning and attention sparsity as complementary strategies for reducing KV-cache memory consumption during large language model inference. Building on our series analysis of semantic prompt caching, we examine how selective token removal and sparse attention patterns can achieve 50-80% memory reduction while preserving generation quality. Three research questions...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources75%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access88%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]92%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 92%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

The UIB Open-Source Benchmark Suite: Architecture, Reproducibility Guarantees, and Community Validation Protocol

Posted on March 27, 2026March 28, 2026 by
Benchmark Research
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19266345  36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted8%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access23%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,650✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,650
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19266345
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (27 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Open-source benchmark frameworks have become the backbone of AI model evaluation, yet none provides simultaneous coverage of multidimensional intelligence measurement, inference cost normalization, and cryptographic reproducibility certification. This article presents the architecture and design rationale for the Universal Intelligence Benchmark (UIB) open-source suite, a modular evaluation fra...

Show moreHide
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19266345 36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted8%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access23%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,650✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,650
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19266345
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (27 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
Universal Intellig…Read More
Read more

Regional Disparities in Ukraine’s Shadow Economy: An Oblasts-Level Analysis 2015–2025

Posted on March 27, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19258692  53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources54%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef62%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed69%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access23%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,086✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,086
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19258692
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]10%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 10%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Ukraine's shadow economy constitutes one of the most persistent structural challenges to its fiscal sustainability and governance reform agenda. While national-level estimates have been widely studied, the regional dimension — how shadow activity distributes across Ukraine's 25 oblasts — remains underexplored in quantitative literature. This article presents an oblasts-level analysis of shadow ...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19258692 53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources54%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef62%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed69%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access23%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,086✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,086
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19258692
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]10%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 10%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

Fresh Repositories Watch: Education Technology — AI Tutoring and Assessment Tools

Posted on March 27, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19245772  51stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed92%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic58%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,881✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,881
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19245772
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (1/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

The open-source education technology landscape has undergone rapid transformation in early 2026, driven by the convergence of large language model capabilities with established pedagogical frameworks. This article surveys emerging open-source repositories created within the past 60 days that address AI-powered tutoring, automated assessment, and multi-agent classroom simulation. We evaluate fiv...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19245772 51stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed92%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic58%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,881✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,881
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19245772
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (1/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Digital Payment Adoption and Shadow Economy Reduction: Evidence from Ukraine’s Diia Platform

Posted on March 26, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19242241  31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources16%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted16%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI21%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed16%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic26%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,361✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,361
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19242241
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]47%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 47%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (24 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

This article examines the relationship between digital payment adoption and shadow economy reduction in Ukraine, with particular focus on the Diia government services platform as a digitalization catalyst. Drawing on National Bank of Ukraine transaction data (2015–2025), cross-country panel evidence, and sector-level informality estimates, we investigate whether cashless payment penetration cau...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19242241 31stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources16%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted16%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI21%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed16%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic26%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,361✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,361
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19242241
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]47%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 47%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (24 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

The UIB Composite Score: Integrating Eight Intelligence Dimensions into a Unified Benchmark

Posted on March 26, 2026 by
Benchmark Research
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19238245  34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted27%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef9%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic9%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,965✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,965
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19238245
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (38 × 60%) + Required (1/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Current artificial intelligence benchmarks measure isolated capabilities — reasoning, coding, knowledge retrieval — yet no single metric captures the multidimensional nature of machine intelligence. This article presents the Universal Intelligence Benchmark (UIB) Composite Score, integrating eight previously defined intelligence dimensions (reasoning, causal, temporal, social, efficiency, trans...

Show moreHide
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19238245 34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted27%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef9%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic9%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,965✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,965
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19238245
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (38 × 60%) + Required (1/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Universal Intellig…Read More
Read more

Quarterly Benchmark: Q1 2026 Open-Source Trust Score Evolution

Posted on March 26, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19233040  23stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,039✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,039
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19233040
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (10 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Open-source software underpins more than 90% of modern application stacks, yet systematic measurement of project trustworthiness remains fragmented across competing frameworks. This article presents the first quarterly benchmark of the Trusted Open Source Index, evaluating 20 high-impact repositories across eight trust dimensions derived from OpenSSF Scorecard, CHAOSS community health metrics, ...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19233040 23stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,039✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,039
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19233040
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (10 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 35
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Comparative Benchmarking: HPF-P vs Traditional Portfolio Methods
  • The Future of Intelligence Measurement: A 10-Year Projection
  • All-You-Can-Eat Agentic AI: The Economics of Unlimited Licensing in an Era of Non-Deterministic Costs
  • The Future of AI Memory — From Fixed Windows to Persistent State
  • FLAI & GROMUS Mathematical Glossary: Complete Variable Reference for Social Media Trend Prediction Models

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.