Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Reference Quality Analysis: Automated Validation of Academic Citations Using CrossRef, DOI, and Source Classification

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Quality Research
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted64%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI27%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef9%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic55%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access64%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,995✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,995
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (42 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Academic citation integrity is a foundational requirement for trustworthy research publishing. Yet the manual verification of hundreds of references per article is neither scalable nor consistent. This article describes the automated reference validation system deployed on the Stabilarity Research Hub — a multi-layer pipeline that combines CrossRef DOI lookup, HTTP status probing, source classi...

Show moreHide
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted64%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI27%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef9%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic55%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access64%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,995✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,995
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (42 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Article Quality Sc…Read More
Read more

Production Cache Monitoring — Metrics and Capacity Planning

Posted on March 30, 2026 by Admin
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506  69stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources48%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted57%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI57%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef52%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed61%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic57%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access35%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,607✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,607
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As key-value (KV) cache systems become the dominant memory consumer in production large language model (LLM) inference, the ability to monitor cache behavior and plan capacity proactively determines whether deployments meet service-level objectives (SLOs) or suffer unpredictable degradation. This article investigates three research questions addressing (1) which monitoring metrics most reliably...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506 69stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources48%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted57%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI57%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef52%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed61%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic57%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access35%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,607✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,607
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Cache Coherence in Multi-Tenant Deployments

Posted on March 30, 2026March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721  68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources40%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI65%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef40%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,358✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language model (LLM) inference platforms scale to serve dozens or hundreds of concurrent tenants on shared GPU clusters, the key-value (KV) cache—the dominant consumer of GPU memory—becomes both a performance bottleneck and a security surface. This article investigates cache coherence challenges that arise when multiple tenants share KV-cache state in production LLM serving systems. We...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721 68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources40%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI65%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef40%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,358✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (61 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

AI Task Taxonomy by Complexity: A Cost Analysis Across Model Architectures (March 2026)

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575  47stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted13%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI54%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic4%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access29%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (26 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Effective enterprise AI deployment requires matching task complexity to model capability — not defaulting to the most capable model for every workload. This meta-analysis introduces a six-tier task complexity taxonomy calibrated to March 2026 API pricing across nineteen models from six major providers. We demonstrate that systematic model-task alignment reduces per-task costs by 60–95% compared...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575 47stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted13%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI54%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic4%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access29%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (26 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Memory Hierarchy — DRAM, HBM, and SSD-Backed Caches

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971  53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI38%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed23%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access69%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,733✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,733
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (45 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Large language model inference demands massive key-value (KV) cache storage that frequently exceeds GPU high-bandwidth memory (HBM) capacity, forcing system designers to exploit multi-tier memory hierarchies spanning HBM, host DRAM, and NVMe SSDs. This article investigates three research questions: how bandwidth and latency characteristics of each memory tier constrain KV cache serving throughp...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971 53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI38%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed23%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access69%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,733✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,733
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (45 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Cache-Aware Request Scheduling and Batching

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142  74stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted72%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef50%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic72%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,876✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,876
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Efficient large language model (LLM) inference depends critically on how requests are scheduled and batched relative to the key-value (KV) cache state across GPU memory. Traditional scheduling strategies — round-robin, least-loaded, and even continuous batching — treat the KV cache as a passive byproduct of inference rather than an active scheduling constraint. This article investigates three r...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142 74stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted72%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef50%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic72%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,876✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,876
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Disaggregated Prefill and Decode Architectures

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904  71stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources56%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef56%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access19%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,157✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,157
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Large language model inference comprises two computationally distinct phases — prefill and decode — that exhibit fundamentally different hardware utilization profiles. Colocating both phases on the same GPU leads to resource contention and suboptimal utilization, a problem that disaggregated architectures address by separating prefill and decode onto dedicated hardware pools. This article inves...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904 71stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources56%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef56%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access19%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,157✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,157
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Distributed KV-Cache in Multi-GPU Serving

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103  75stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources65%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef65%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed65%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic47%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models scale beyond the memory capacity of individual accelerators, distributing inference across multiple GPUs introduces fundamental challenges for key-value cache management. This article examines how tensor parallelism, pipeline parallelism, and emerging hybrid strategies partition KV-cache state across devices, analyzing the communication overhead, memory efficiency, and ...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103 75stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources65%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef65%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed65%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic47%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Flash Attention’s Role in Memory-Efficient Inference

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451  68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef55%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Flash Attention has become the foundational kernel technology enabling memory-efficient inference in large language models (LLMs), transforming how attention computation interacts with GPU memory hierarchies. This article investigates three research questions: (1) how does Flash Attention's tiling strategy reduce peak memory consumption compared to standard attention, and what are the theoretic...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451 68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef55%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Sliding Window and Compressive Caching for Infinite Context

Posted on March 28, 2026March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498  61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI83%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef26%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed35%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic22%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access30%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,250✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,250
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (49 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models (LLMs) scale to context windows exceeding one million tokens, the key-value (KV) cache grows linearly and becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during autoregressive inference. Sliding window attention and compressive caching represent two complementary families of techniques that bound memory usage while preserving access to long-range context. This article investigat...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498 61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI83%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef26%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed35%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic22%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access30%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,250✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,250
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (49 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 35
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Comparative Benchmarking: HPF-P vs Traditional Portfolio Methods
  • The Future of Intelligence Measurement: A 10-Year Projection
  • All-You-Can-Eat Agentic AI: The Economics of Unlimited Licensing in an Era of Non-Deterministic Costs
  • The Future of AI Memory — From Fixed Windows to Persistent State
  • FLAI & GROMUS Mathematical Glossary: Complete Variable Reference for Social Media Trend Prediction Models

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.