Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

The Shadow IT AI Layer: Unauthorized Copilot and ChatGPT Usage in the Capability Gap

Posted on July 7, 2026July 8, 2026 by
Gap Research
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The diffusion of generative AI copilots such as Microsoft Copilot and OpenAI ChatGPT has produced a new class of unsanctioned employee tool usage—commonly labeled shadow AI. This article provides a systematic quantification of shadow AI adoption across Fortune 500 enterprises and evaluates its net effect on the organizational capability gap. Employing a mixed‑methods design that integrates a la...

Show moreHide
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21254149
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]82%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 82%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Capability-Adoptio…Read More
Read more

Readability and Conceptual Depth Metrics for AI Research Content: Beyond Flesch-Kincaid

Posted on July 7, 2026July 7, 2026 by
Quality Research
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed6%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic94%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,172✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,172
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid proliferation of AI‑generated text in scholarly and professional contexts demands robust, multidimensional evaluation tools that go beyond traditional readability formulas such as Flesch‑Kincaid. This article introduces a composite quality metric that integrates four independent dimensions: (1) surface‑level readability, (2) conceptual density, (3) argumentative coherence, and (4) exp...

Show moreHide
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed6%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic94%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,172✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,172
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21246741
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Article Quality Sc…Read More
Read more

Manufacturing AI Observability: Predictive Maintenance Explanation Quality

Posted on July 7, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI98%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References48 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,191✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,191
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability in AI-driven predictive maintenance remains a critical but under‑quantified factor in industrial deployments. This article investigates how the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated explanations affect maintenance decision outcomes in large‑scale manufacturing environments. We define explanation quality along three dimensions—clarity, fidelity, and actionable insight—and const...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI98%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References48 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,191✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,191
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21230446
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (75 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI ObservabilityRead More
Read more

Supply Chain Attacks on ML Models: Poisoning, Backdoors, and Trojan Detection in Open Weights

Posted on July 6, 2026July 6, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007  53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,318✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,318
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Supply chain attacks targeting machine l[REDACTED]g (ML) pipelines have emerged as a critical threat vector, compromising model integrity through poisoning, backdoor insertion, and Trojan triggers embedded in ostensibly benign training data. This article systematically reviews the state of the art in model poisoning attack vectors within open-source ML ecosystems, focusing on Hugging Face Hub a...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007 53stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted85%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI77%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,318✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,318
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21221007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Cash Flow Anomaly Detection: AI Models for Identifying Undeclared Income in SME Tax Returns

Posted on July 5, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21209524  34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,304✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,304
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21209524
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Unreported income among small and medium enterprises (SMEs) remains a critical challenge for tax authorities globally, with recent studies indicating that undeclared income accounts for 15-25% of the tax gap in European OECD nations. This article addresses the gap in current tax compliance tools by developing and evaluating machine l[REDACTED]g models specifically designed to detect anomalous c...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21209524 34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,304✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,304
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21209524
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Post-Transformer Architectures in 2025: Mamba, RWKV, and Hybrid Models in Production

Posted on July 5, 2026July 6, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21213310  65stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted87%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic87%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,264✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,264
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21213310
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) has e[REDACTED]sed scalability bottlenecks inherent in the Transformer architecture, particularly its quadratic complexity in attention computation. Recent advances propose alternative paradigms—state‑space models (SSMs) such as Mamba and RWKV, as well as hybrid architectures that blend linear attention with selective state propagation—as viab...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21213310 65stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted87%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic87%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,264✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,264
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21213310
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

Property-Based Testing for LLM Outputs: Hypothesis Strategies for Non-Deterministic AI

Posted on July 4, 2026July 5, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21199434  59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted97%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References32 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]628✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 628
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21199434
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Property-based testing (PBT) has emerged as a systematic method for uncovering edge-case failures in complex software systems [1]. Recent extensions to nondeterministic domains, particularly large language models (LLMs), enable the definition of invariants that must hold across varying model outputs [2]. This article introduces a framework for applying PBT to LLM-powered systems, focusing on hy...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21199434 59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted97%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References32 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]628✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 628
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21199434
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (74 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Speculative Decoding in Production: Throughput Gains vs Infrastructure Complexity Trade-offs

Posted on July 4, 2026July 5, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21195947  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted90%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]989✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 989
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21195947
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (65 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Speculative decoding is an inference acceleration technique that leverages a lightweight draft model to propose tokens which are subsequently verified by a target model. This abstract outlines a production-focused benchmark of three speculative decoding implementations — Medusa, Eagle, and SpecTr — evaluated across a diverse set of real-world workloads. We quantify throughput improvements, late...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21195947 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted90%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI80%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic85%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]989✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 989
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21195947
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]89%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 89%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (65 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Total Cost of Ownership for Enterprise LLMs: A 2025 Framework Beyond GPU Cost

Posted on July 3, 2026July 4, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21186552  47stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI63%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References8 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,889✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,889
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21186552
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (54 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Enterprise adoption of large language models (LLMs) has progressed from experimental pilots to core production workloads, yet most organizations continue to compute return on investment (ROI) using GPU‐hour pricing as the sole cost driver. This narrow view systematically underestimates the true economic burden of LLMs, omitting fine‑tuning expenses, retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) infrastr...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21186552 47stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI63%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References8 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,889✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,889
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21186552
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (54 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

AI Conflict Prediction Accuracy: Evaluating Forecasting Models Against 2024-2025 Events

Posted on July 3, 2026July 3, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21177685  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources71%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted86%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef71%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed71%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,334✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,334
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21177685
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (85 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The proliferation of AI-driven geopolitical risk forecasting has transformed conflict prediction methodologies, yet systematic validation against real-world outcomes remains incomplete. This study conducts a retrospective evaluation of five major forecasting platforms—including PredictIt, Metaculus, and three commercial vendors—against 47 documented conflict escalations between January 2024 and...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21177685 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources71%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted86%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef71%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed71%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,334✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,334
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21177685
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]85%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 85%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (85 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 60
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Cost Spillover Effects: How AI Projects Reconfigure Internal R&D Budget Allocation
  • Carbon Ledger of AI Inference: Accounting for Emissions Across Distributed Computing Nodes
  • Hybrid Warfare Signal Intelligence: AI for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation in Critical Infrastructure
  • Semantic Coherence vs Plagiarism Thresholds: Automated Detection of Overlaps in AI-Written Content
  • AI Alignment Progress Report 2025: RLHF Successors and Constitutional AI Evaluation

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

590+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.