Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19354653 73stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 14% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 91% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 27% | ○ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 14% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 36% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 73% | ○ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 95% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 22 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 2,276 | ✓ | Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,276 |
| [u] | Original [REQ] | 100% | ✓ | ≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique |
| [e] | Evidence [REQ] | 14 | ✓ | Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 14 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19354653 |
| [o] | ORCID | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed | — | ○ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness | 72% | ✓ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 72% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 4 | ✓ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4 |
| [g] | Code | ✓ | ✓ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
Score = Ref Trust (59 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (5/7 × 10%)
The expansion of large language model context windows to 128K+ tokens has reopened a fundamental architectural question: should AI systems remember through retrieval from external stores or through attention over internally maintained representations? This article investigates three research questions about the comparative performance of retrieval-augmented memory (RAM) and pure attention memor...
Show moreHideTechnical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19354653 73stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
AI MemoryRead More| Badge | Metric | Value | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [s] | Reviewed Sources | 14% | ○ | ≥80% from editorially reviewed sources |
| [t] | Trusted | 91% | ✓ | ≥80% from verified, high-quality sources |
| [a] | DOI | 27% | ○ | ≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier |
| [b] | CrossRef | 14% | ○ | ≥80% indexed in CrossRef |
| [i] | Indexed | 36% | ○ | ≥80% have metadata indexed |
| [l] | Academic | 73% | ○ | ≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints |
| [f] | Free Access | 95% | ✓ | ≥80% are freely accessible |
| [r] | References | 22 refs | ✓ | Minimum 10 references required |
| [w] | Words [REQ] | 2,276 | ✓ | Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,276 |
| [u] | Original [REQ] | 100% | ✓ | ≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique |
| [e] | Evidence [REQ] | 14 | ✓ | Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 14 |
| [d] | DOI [REQ] | ✓ | ✓ | Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19354653 |
| [o] | ORCID | ✓ | ✓ | Author ORCID verified for academic identity |
| [p] | Peer Reviewed | — | ○ | Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer |
| [h] | Freshness | 72% | ✓ | ≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 72% |
| [c] | Data Charts | 4 | ✓ | Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4 |
| [g] | Code | ✓ | ✓ | Source code available on GitHub |
| [m] | Diagrams | 3 | ✓ | Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3 |
| [x] | Cited by | 0 | ○ | Referenced by 0 other hub article(s) |
Score = Ref Trust (59 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (5/7 × 10%)