Category: Geopolitical Risk Intelligence

Data-driven political and economic risk predictions. Monitoring public databases, historical analysis, and predictive modeling for community safety.

Survival as a Strategy: Ukraine’s AI Trajectory in War and Peace

Posted on by Admin
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813  42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,208✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,208
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]7%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

We can already observe the development and implementation of artificial intelligence in various spheres of human activity. And, strange as it may seem, Ukraine's success in using advanced technologies, particularly in the military sphere, is logically and predictably driven by its need to survive in a challenging war against a powerful adversary. While the use of artificial intelligence in othe...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813 42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,208✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,208
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]7%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Ukraine’s AI Duality: World Leader in Battlefield Systems, Lagging in Civil Adoption

Posted on by
Gap Research
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896514  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic13%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896514
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]6%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 6%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Ukraine has emerged as the most intensively documented front-line AI deployment environment in recorded conflict history — simultaneously pioneering battlefield AI systems that have reshaped NATO's operational doctrine and building a surprisingly resilient civil e-governance infrastructure under active wartime conditions. Yet beneath these headline achievements lies a stark bifurcation: Ukraine...

Show moreHide
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896514 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic13%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896514
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]6%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 6%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Capability-Adoptio…Read More
Read more

Decision-Cycle Compression in AI-Augmented Warfare: Ukraine and the Indian Ocean Engagement

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896370  32stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted37%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic5%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access37%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,980✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,980
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896370
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (19 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This paper presents a comparative analysis of AI-assisted decision systems in two empirically distinct kinetic environments: the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war (2022–2026), which constitutes the most extensively documented contemporary frontline proving of AI-augmented battlefield management, and the sinking of the Iranian Navy frigate IRIS Dena by USS Charlotte on 4 March 2026 in the Indian Ocean...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896370 32stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted37%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic5%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access37%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,980✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,980
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896370
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (19 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Middle East AI Investment Surge: AWS Saudi Arabia and the Race for Regional AI Dominance

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18889315  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted47%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI18%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef12%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed12%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic24%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access41%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,008✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,008
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18889315
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The Middle East has emerged as one of the world's most contested AI infrastructure battlegrounds, with Gulf states deploying trillions in sovereign wealth to position themselves as neutral nodes in an increasingly fragmented global AI order. Amazon Web Services' $5.3 billion Saudi Arabia cloud region—augmented by an additional $5 billion AI Zone built in partnership with HUMAIN, a Public Invest...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18889315 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted47%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI18%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef12%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed12%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic24%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access41%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,008✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,008
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18889315
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

AI Sovereignty as Geopolitical Strategy: The EU–US Regulatory Divergence and Its Global Consequences

Posted on by D G
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18886429  42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted63%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic26%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,175✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,175
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18886429
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (36 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The governance of artificial intelligence has become the defining axis of geopolitical competition in 2026. Where the United States has pivoted decisively toward federal deregulation — preempting state-level AI laws and dismantling Biden-era executive oversight — the European Union advances an increasingly assertive sovereignty architecture anchored by the AI Act, scheduled for full enforcement...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18886429 42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted63%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic26%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,175✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,175
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18886429
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (36 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Israel-Iran Escalation: How Kinetic Conflict Tests AI Defense Infrastructure

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18883019  26stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted23%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed18%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic18%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access27%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,739✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,739
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18883019
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (19 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The March 2026 Israel-Iran kinetic conflict represents the most extensive real-world stress test of AI-integrated defense infrastructure in history. For the first time, artificial intelligence systems are not peripheral tools but embedded operational components — driving target identification, missile intercept prioritization, drone swarm coordination, and cyber-offensive operations at machine ...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18883019 26stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted23%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed18%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic18%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access27%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,739✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,739
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18883019
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]35%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 35%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (19 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

China AI Industrial Strategy: The 15th Five-Year Plan and the Weaponization of Technological Dominance

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881597  40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI15%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic31%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access46%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,146✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,146
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881597
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (33 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

On March 5, 2026, China's National People's Congress unveiled the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030), setting an unambiguous course: embed artificial intelligence across the entire industrial and economic machine as a core pillar of national security. This analysis examines the plan's strategic architecture, its geopolitical signal value, and its implications for the global AI competition. Drawing...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881597 40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI15%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic31%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access46%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,146✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,146
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881597
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (33 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

The Anthropic Alliance: Amazon, NVIDIA, and Big Tech’s Coalition Against Pentagon Supply-Chain Weaponization

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18879322  36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted45%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,599✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,599
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18879322
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]29%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 29%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

On February 27, 2026, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a "supply-chain risk to national security," triggering an unprecedented industry response. Within days, Amazon, NVIDIA, OpenAI, and Apple had joined a formal Big Tech coalition challenging the designation — a coalition that signals a structural shift in the relationship between state power and commercial AI governanc...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18879322 36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted45%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,599✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,599
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18879322
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]29%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 29%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Anthropic Pentagon Dispute: When AI Safety Clashes with National Security Contracts

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18875959  30stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted37%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic21%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access37%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,978✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,978
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18875959
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]45%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 45%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (26 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The escalating confrontation between Anthropic and the United States Department of Defense represents a watershed moment in the governance of frontier AI systems. Beginning with a $200 million classified-network contract signed in mid-2025, the dispute erupted in February 2026 when Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth demanded unfettered access to Anthropic's Claude model—including the removal of ...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18875959 30stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted37%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic21%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access37%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,978✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,978
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18875959
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]45%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 45%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (26 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

The OpenAI-Pentagon-NATO Triangle: When AI Labs Become Defense Contractors

Posted on by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18872864  38stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic21%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access43%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,776✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,776
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18872864
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (29 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The week of February 27–March 4, 2026 marked a structural inflection point in the geopolitics of artificial intelligence: OpenAI signed a classified-environment deployment agreement with the U.S. Department of Defense, then within days disclosed it was considering a contract with NATO's unclassified networks. Simultaneously, Anthropic was designated a national security "supply-chain risk" by De...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18872864 38stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed21%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic21%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access43%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,776✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,776
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18872864
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (29 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more