Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

[Medical ML] Failed Implementations: What Went Wrong

Posted on February 8, 2026March 6, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752878  

Despite over $66.8 billion invested globally in healthcare AI (2021 alone), the field has produced spectacular failures alongside its successes. Understanding what went wrong—and why—is essential for any hospital considering AI adoption.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752878
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

[Medical ML] China’s Massive Medical AI Deployment

Posted on February 8, 2026February 20, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18645077  67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef25%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,754✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,754
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18645077
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (77 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

China has emerged as the world's fastest-growing healthcare AI market, demonstrating that large-scale medical AI deployment is achievable through coordinated policy, infrastructure investment, and strategic regulatory frameworks. This article provides comprehensive analysis of China's medical AI ecosystem, examining market growth from $900 million in 2020 to a projected $18.9 billion by 2030, t...

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18645077 67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef25%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,754✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,754
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18645077
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (77 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

[Medical ML] UK NHS AI Lab: Lessons Learned from a £250 Million National AI Programme

Posted on February 8, 2026February 26, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18672171  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,596✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,596
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18672171
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The UK's NHS AI Lab, operating from 2019 to 2025 with £250 million in initial funding, represents the world's most ambitious national attempt to systematically deploy artificial intelligence in healthcare. This analysis examines the programme's comprehensive evaluation, documenting both its remarkable achievements—including £44 million in demonstrated cost savings and the development of crucial...

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18672171 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,596✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,596
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18672171
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

[Medical ML] EU Experience: CE-Marked Diagnostic AI

Posted on February 8, 2026February 15, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752882  

Ukraine's regulatory trajectory aligns with the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) through ongoing European integration reforms. Understanding the European CE marking process—with its emphasis on clinical evidence and post-market surveillance—directly informs how Ukrainian hospitals should evaluate AI diagnostic tools.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752882
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

[Medical ML] US Experience: FDA-Approved AI Devices

Posted on February 8, 2026March 10, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752886  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,099✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,099
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752886
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

As Ukraine develops its regulatory framework for medical AI (aligned with EU MDR through recent reforms), understanding the world's largest medical AI market provides invaluable lessons. The US FDA has authorized over 1,200 AI/ML-enabled medical devices—more than any other regulatory body—making it the de facto testing ground for medical AI deployment.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752886 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,099✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,099
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752886
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

[Medical ML] Regulatory Landscape for Medical AI: FDA, CE Marking, and Ukrainian MHSU

Posted on February 8, 2026March 10, 2026 by Yoman
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752890  

For ScanLab and any medical AI initiative targeting Ukrainian healthcare, regulatory compliance isn't optional—it's existential. Understanding the regulatory landscape determines:

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752890
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

US Experience: FDA-Approved AI Devices – 1,200+ Authorizations, Critical Evidence Gaps

Posted on February 8, 2026March 7, 2026 by Admin
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752892  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,111✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,111
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752892
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

As Ukraine develops its regulatory framework for medical AI (aligned with EU MDR through recent reforms), understanding the world's largest medical AI market provides invaluable lessons. The US FDA has authorized over 1,200 AI/ML-enabled medical devices—more than any other regulatory body—making it the de facto testing ground for medical AI deployment.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752892 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,111✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,111
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752892
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

Regulatory Landscape for Medical AI: FDA, CE Marking, and Ukrainian MHSU

Posted on February 8, 2026February 26, 2026 by Admin
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752894  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,617✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,617
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752894
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams7✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 7
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (56 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Navigating the regulatory landscape for medical AI requires understanding three distinct frameworks: the FDA's mature Software as Medical Device (SaMD) pathway with over 1,200 approved AI/ML devices, the EU's dual MDR/AI Act compliance burden, and Ukraine's transitional system awaiting MDR harmonization. This analysis maps pathways for ScanLab and similar Ukrainian medical AI initiatives, ident...

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752894 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,617✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,617
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752894
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams7✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 7
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (56 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

Data Requirements and Quality Standards for Medical Imaging AI

Posted on February 8, 2026February 25, 2026 by Admin
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752896  52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef11%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed44%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic44%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access56%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,133✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,133
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752896
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (52 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This article examines the critical data quality standards required for medical imaging AI systems, revealing that of 1,016 FDA-approved AI medical devices, 93.3% did not report training data source and 76.3% lacked demographic information. We establish a comprehensive framework for data quality assessment including the six pillars of medical imaging data quality, bias sources and mitigation str...

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752896 52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef11%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed44%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic44%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access56%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,133✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,133
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752896
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (52 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

Data Requirements and Quality Standards for Medical ML

Posted on February 8, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752898  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,175✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,175
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752898
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Models pre-trained on a Collection of Public Medical Image Datasets (CPMID) covering X-ray, CT, and MRI outperformed ImageNet pre-training by:

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752898 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,175✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,175
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752898
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Comparative Benchmarking: HPF-P vs Traditional Portfolio Methods
  • The Future of Intelligence Measurement: A 10-Year Projection
  • All-You-Can-Eat Agentic AI: The Economics of Unlimited Licensing in an Era of Non-Deterministic Costs
  • The Future of AI Memory — From Fixed Windows to Persistent State
  • FLAI & GROMUS Mathematical Glossary: Complete Variable Reference for Social Media Trend Prediction Models

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.