Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

DRI Calibration Methodology: Empirical Approaches to Threshold Optimization in Pharmaceutical Decision Systems

Posted on March 18, 2026 by
Framework Research
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19102033  55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI48%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed52%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,610✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,610
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19102033
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]45%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 45%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (58 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Threshold calibration represents the bridge between theoretical decision indices and operational pharmaceutical portfolio management. The HPF-P framework defines DRI as a composite measure of data completeness, model confidence, and environmental stability — but the boundaries between "decide," "defer," and "escalate" zones require empirical determination. We present a three-stage calibration m...

Show moreHide
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19102033 55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI48%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed52%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,610✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,610
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19102033
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]45%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 45%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (58 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
HPF-P FrameworkRead More
Read more

Local LLM Deployment — Hardware Requirements and True Costs

Posted on March 18, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19097902  45stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted29%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI24%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed86%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access90%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,945✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,945
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19097902
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (41 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The decision between cloud-hosted API inference and local LLM deployment represents one of the most consequential infrastructure choices enterprises face in 2026. While API providers offer simplicity and elastic scaling, local deployment promises data sovereignty, predictable costs, and elimination of per-token pricing. This article provides a rigorous analysis of hardware requirements across d...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19097902 45stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted29%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI24%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed86%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access90%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,945✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,945
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19097902
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]64%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 64%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (41 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Pricing Deep Dive: Token Economics Across Major Providers

Posted on March 18, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19087980  40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted45%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI32%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic41%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access77%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,857✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,857
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19087980
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (42 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The cost of large language model (LLM) inference has become the dominant line item in enterprise AI budgets, with inference now accounting for approximately 85% of total AI spending. Yet token pricing structures remain opaque, inconsistent across providers, and poorly understood by the engineers who design systems around them. This article dissects the token economics of major LLM providers as ...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19087980 40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted45%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI32%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic41%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access77%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,857✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,857
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19087980
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (42 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Knowledge Collapse Economics: The Hidden Cost of Outsourcing Cognition to AI

Posted on March 18, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080440  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI42%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef33%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic8%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,148✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,148
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080440
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]73%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 73%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The dominant narrative around artificial intelligence economics focuses on productivity gains, labor displacement, and cost optimization. A less examined but potentially more consequential dimension is emerging: the erosion of collective human knowledge when AI substitutes for cognitive effort rather than augmenting it. This article analyzes the economic implications of knowledge collapse — a p...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080440 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI42%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef33%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic8%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,148✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,148
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080440
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]73%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 73%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Caching and Context Management — Reducing Token Costs by 80%

Posted on March 17, 2026March 17, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19076627  45stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access75%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,970✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,970
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19076627
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]31%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 31%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (51 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Token costs are the largest variable expense in production AI systems. For enterprises running thousands of daily API calls, optimising how context is stored, reused, and compressed is not an architectural nicety — it is the difference between a viable product and an unscalable one. This article provides a practitioner's map of the three caching layers now available to enterprise AI teams — KV-...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19076627 45stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access75%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,970✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,970
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19076627
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]31%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 31%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (51 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Integrating DRI and DRL: A Unified Decision Readiness Assessment Protocol for HPF-P

Posted on March 17, 2026 by
Framework Research
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19071139  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources20%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed80%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic55%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,247✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,247
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19071139
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]48%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 48%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The Heuristic Prediction Framework for Pharma (HPF-P) introduced two complementary constructs for evaluating decision quality in AI-augmented pharmaceutical portfolio management: the Decision Readiness Index (DRI), which quantifies information sufficiency, and the Decision Readiness Level (DRL), which assesses organizational maturity. While each metric addresses a distinct dimension of readines...

Show moreHide
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19071139 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources20%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed80%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic55%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,247✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,247
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19071139
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]48%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 48%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
HPF-P FrameworkRead More
Read more

Inference-Agnostic Intelligence: The UIB Theoretical Framework

Posted on March 17, 2026 by
Benchmark Research
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19064304  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted74%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI42%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed68%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic63%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access74%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,086✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,086
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19064304
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Current AI benchmarks measure narrow task performance — accuracy on question sets, code generation pass rates, or image recognition scores. They rarely ask the deeper question: what is intelligence, and how should we measure it independent of the hardware, API, or inference provider running the model? This article proposes the Universal Intelligence Benchmark (UIB) theoretical framework: an eig...

Show moreHide
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19064304 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources11%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted74%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI42%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed68%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic63%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access74%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,086✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,086
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19064304
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Universal Intellig…Read More
Read more

Decision Readiness Level (DRL): Operationalizing Maturity Assessment for AI-Augmented Pharmaceutical Portfolio Management

Posted on March 17, 2026 by
Framework Research
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19059359  56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI44%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed88%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic56%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,272✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,272
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19059359
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (59 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The Heuristic Prediction Framework for Pharma (HPF-P) defines decision readiness through two complementary constructs: the Decision Readiness Index (DRI), which quantifies information sufficiency for a given decision context, and the Decision Readiness Level (DRL), which measures organizational maturity in applying AI-augmented decision processes. While previous work formalized DRI as a continu...

Show moreHide
Framework Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19059359 56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI44%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef6%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed88%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic56%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,272✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,272
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19059359
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]58%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 58%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (59 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
HPF-P FrameworkRead More
Read more

Proprioception and Internal State Estimation: Joint Encoders, Torque Sensing, and Body Schema for Humanoid Robots

Posted on March 16, 2026 by
Engineering Research
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19057213  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources39%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted83%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI48%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef22%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed78%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic78%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,000✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,000
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19057213
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]43%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 43%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

A humanoid robot that cannot sense its own body is a humanoid robot that falls down. Proprioception — the internal sensing of joint positions, velocities, torques, and overall body configuration — is the foundation upon which every higher-level capability depends. Without accurate proprioceptive state estimation, locomotion controllers cannot maintain balance, manipulation pipelines cannot clos...

Show moreHide
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19057213 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources39%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted83%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI48%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef22%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed78%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic78%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,000✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,000
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19057213
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]43%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 43%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Open HumanoidRead More
Read more

Deterministic Guardrails for Enterprise Agents — Compliance Without Killing Autonomy

Posted on March 16, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19053079  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI27%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic27%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access59%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]889✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 889
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19053079
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The enterprise AI agent landscape in 2026 faces a paradox: organizations deploy autonomous agents to reduce costs and increase throughput, yet every autonomous action introduces compliance risk. The EU AI Act reaches full enforcement on August 2, 2026, NIST has launched its AI Agent Standards Initiative, and enterprises face penalties of up to 7% of global turnover for non-compliance. This arti...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19053079 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI27%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed45%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic27%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access59%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]889✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 889
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19053079
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (40 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 49
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • The Open Source AI Trust Gap: When Community Projects Do Not Meet Enterprise Standards
  • Запускаємо розділ кафедри ЕКІТ на hub.stabilarity.com
  • Cross-Industry AI Transparency Stacks: Open Source Reference Architectures for XAI
  • Trusted Federated Learning XAI: Open Source for Privacy-Preserving Explanations
  • The Bus Factor of XAI: Community Risk in Critical Open Source Explainability Tools

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

480+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.