Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

The Meta-Meta-Analysis: A Systematic Map of What 200 AI Benchmark Studies Actually Measured

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Benchmark Research
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19001033  42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted44%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed44%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic31%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access38%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,353✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,353
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19001033
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]38%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 38%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

We present a meta-meta-analysis of 217 benchmark evaluation studies published between 2020 and 2026, examining not the benchmarks themselves but the systematic reviews that assess them. Our coverage matrix reveals a profound structural bias: 78.3% of surveyed studies evaluate text-based capabilities, while causal reasoning (4.1%), embodied intelligence (1.8%), and social cognition (0.9%) remain...

Show moreHide
Benchmark Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19001033 42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources6%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted44%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed44%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic31%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access38%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,353✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,353
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19001033
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]38%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 38%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Universal Intellig…Read More
Read more

Anticipatory Intelligence in 2026: What Changed, What Didn’t, and What We Got Wrong

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Dmytro Grybeniuk & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998637  25stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted22%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic9%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access9%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,979✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,979
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998637
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]37%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 37%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (18 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Fifteen articles in, we promised a systematic map of gaps in anticipatory intelligence. Now the field has had a year to respond — or not. Foundation models claim temporal reasoning (GPT-5.4, Gemini via Groundsource). The EU AI Act's high-risk provisions hit enforcement. Distribution shift monitoring went from research curiosity to SaaS checkbox. This retrospective measures our predictions again...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Dmytro Grybeniuk & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998637 25stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources9%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted22%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed9%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic9%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access9%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,979✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,979
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998637
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]37%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 37%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (18 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Anticipatory Intel…Read More
Read more

Chapter 15: Data Analysis in the Age of Foundation Models — A 2026 Reassessment

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998582  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,044✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,044
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998582
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Across Chapters 1 through 14 of this series, we built a careful taxonomy of data mining methods — classification trees, clustering algorithms, regression models, association rules, and dimensionality reduction techniques. Each method occupied a well-defined place. Each had known strengths, assumptions, and failure modes. That taxonomy served the field faithfully for over two decades.

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998582 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,044✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,044
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998582
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Review: EcoAI-Resilience — When R² = 0.99 Should Make You Nervous, Not Confident

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998542  46stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources7%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed47%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access73%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,563✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,563
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998542
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]36%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 36%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

ALsobeh and Alkurdi introduce EcoAI-Resilience, a multi-objective optimization framework that simultaneously targets three goals: maximizing sustainability impact from AI deployment, enhancing economic resilience, and minimizing environmental costs. The framework is trained and validated on data from 53 countries across 14 sectors over the period 2015–2024. The authors report extraordinarily hi...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998542 46stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources7%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed47%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access73%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,563✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,563
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998542
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]36%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 36%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Technical Gaps Synthesis: Priority Matrix for Anticipatory Intelligence Systems

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Dmytro Grybeniuk & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18994007  58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI36%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed64%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,019✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,019
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18994007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]15%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 15%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Six gaps. $537 billion in annual friction. This synthesis constructs a priority matrix for the technical deficiencies identified across the Anticipatory Intelligence series. Using a three-dimensional scoring framework — economic impact, feasibility, and dependency structure — we rank which problems deserve immediate research investment and which will wait decades for breakthroughs that may neve...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Dmytro Grybeniuk & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18994007 58stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI36%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed64%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,019✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,019
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18994007
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]15%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 15%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (73 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Anticipatory Intel…Read More
Read more

The Monitor Shows What Nobody Wants to See: AI Is Here, It Is Eating Jobs, and We Can Only Watch

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Gap Research
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18993208  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,911✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,911
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18993208
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Odesa National Polytechnic University, Department of Economic Cybernetics · PhD Candidate, ML in Pharma Economics

Show moreHide
Gap Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18993208 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,911✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,911
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18993208
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Capability-Adoptio…Read More
Read more

Speech Interface: Wake Word Detection, On-Device ASR, and Natural Language Command Parsing for Humanoid Robots

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Engineering Research
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992712  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,675✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,675
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992712
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Natural language interaction is central to human-robot collaboration. Humanoid robots operating in indoor environments must process continuous speech, detect wake words at low latency, perform automatic speech recognition (ASR) on-device to avoid cloud latency and privacy concerns, parse intent from variable linguistic input, and respond with synthesised speech — all within power and computatio...

Show moreHide
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992712 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,675✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,675
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992712
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Open HumanoidRead More
Read more

Force Control and Compliant Motion: Impedance Control, Contact Estimation, and Safe Physical Interaction for Humanoid Robots

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Engineering Research
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992710  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,702✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,702
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992710
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Safe interaction with unstructured environments and direct physical contact with humans requires that humanoid robots move beyond position-stiff control toward compliant, force-aware systems. This article specifies the force control subsystem for the Open Humanoid platform, addressing impedance and admittance control architectures, distributed force-torque sensing at joints and end-effectors, c...

Show moreHide
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992710 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,702✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,702
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992710
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Open HumanoidRead More
Read more

Navigation and Path Planning: Indoor Mapping, Obstacle Avoidance, and Social Space Awareness for Humanoid Robots

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Engineering Research
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992693  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,693✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,693
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992693
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Autonomous navigation in human-shared indoor environments requires a humanoid robot to simultaneously solve geometric path planning, dynamic obstacle avoidance, and social space compliance — a hierarchical problem spanning global route discovery, local collision-free motion, and implicit human comfort modelling. This article presents the navigation subsystem for the Open Humanoid platform, cove...

Show moreHide
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992693 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,693✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,693
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992693
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Open HumanoidRead More
Read more

Hand and Manipulation: Dexterous Grippers, Tendon Actuation, and In-Hand Object Control for Humanoid Robots

Posted on March 13, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Engineering Research
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992685  60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,019✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,019
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992685
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Dexterous manipulation—the ability to grasp, adjust grip, and rotate objects within the hand—fundamentally distinguishes humanoid robots from industrial arms. This article presents a comprehensive specification for the Open Humanoid hand subsystem, covering the critical trade-offs between degrees of freedom and control complexity, underactuated versus fully-actuated finger architectures, tendon...

Show moreHide
Engineering Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992685 60stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,019✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,019
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18992685
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Open HumanoidRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 35
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Comparative Benchmarking: HPF-P vs Traditional Portfolio Methods
  • The Future of Intelligence Measurement: A 10-Year Projection
  • All-You-Can-Eat Agentic AI: The Economics of Unlimited Licensing in an Era of Non-Deterministic Costs
  • The Future of AI Memory — From Fixed Windows to Persistent State
  • FLAI & GROMUS Mathematical Glossary: Complete Variable Reference for Social Media Trend Prediction Models

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.