Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Category: AI Economics

AI Economics: Risk, Cost, and ROI Research by Oleh Ivchenko

Edge AI Economics: When Edge Beats Cloud

Posted on March 2, 2026March 5, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18830495  37stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources14%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted29%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI21%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef14%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access29%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,731✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,731
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18830495
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (28 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Edge AI — the deployment of artificial intelligence inference workloads on devices and infrastructure proximate to data sources rather than in centralised cloud environments — is transitioning from an engineering curiosity to a mainstream economic necessity. With the global edge AI market valued at approximately $35.81 billion in 2025 and projected to reach $385.89 billion by 2034, the financia...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18830495 37stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources14%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted29%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI21%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef14%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access29%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,731✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,731
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18830495
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (28 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Multi-Cloud Strategy Economics: Arbitrage, Lock-In Costs, and AI Workload Optimization

Posted on March 1, 2026March 1, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821  27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted7%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic7%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,372✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,372
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Multi-cloud strategy has evolved from a risk-mitigation posture into a primary economic lever for enterprise AI operations. As generative AI workloads consume an increasing share of cloud budgets — projected at 10–15% of total cloud spend by 2030 according to Goldman Sachs research — the economic calculus of distributing workloads across AWS, Azure, and GCP has become significantly more complex...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821 27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted7%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic7%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,372✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,372
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

AI Infrastructure Investment ROI — The Capex War Winners and Losers

Posted on March 1, 2026March 7, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted21%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI3%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed83%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access24%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References29 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,454✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,454
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The AI infrastructure investment cycle has reached unprecedented scale, with hyperscalers projected to spend over $600 billion in 2026—a 36% increase over 2025. This paper analyzes the economic fundamentals underlying this capital expenditure war, revealing a stark ROI crisis: AI data centers commissioned in 2025 face $40 billion in annual depreciation costs while generating only $15-20 billion...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted21%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI3%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed83%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access24%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References29 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,454✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,454
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Testing and Validation Costs in Enterprise AI: Economic Analysis of Quality Assurance Investment

Posted on February 24, 2026February 24, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18755863  28stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted10%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed10%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,993✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,993
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18755863
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]5%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 5%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (13 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Testing and validation represent 10-15% of total AI development costs, yet inadequate investment in this phase contributes significantly to the 80-95% failure rate of AI projects. This paper presents an economic framework for analyzing testing and validation costs across the AI lifecycle, from initial test data acquisition through continuous production monitoring. We examine cost structures of ...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18755863 28stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted10%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed10%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,993✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,993
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18755863
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]5%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 5%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (13 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Integration Economics: Legacy System Adaptation for AI Deployment

Posted on February 23, 2026March 10, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18740871  34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources8%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted23%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI15%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic23%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References40 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,661✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,661
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18740871
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]12%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 12%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (23 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Integrating artificial intelligence into existing enterprise infrastructure represents one of the most significant economic challenges in AI deployment. While substantial research examines AI development costs, the economics of legacy system adaptation remain inadequately explored. This paper presents a comprehensive economic framework for understanding integration costs, analyzing cost structu...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18740871 34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources8%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted23%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI15%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic23%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References40 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,661✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,661
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18740871
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]12%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 12%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (23 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Compliance Costs: GDPR, AI Act, and Industry-Specific Regulations

Posted on February 22, 2026March 9, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730888  36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic8%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access32%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References37 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,425✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,425
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730888
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Regulatory compliance represents a critical economic dimension of enterprise AI deployment, with costs ranging from $20,000 for small implementations to over $15 million for large-scale high-risk systems. This article analyzes compliance cost structures across major regulatory frameworks — GDPR, EU AI Act, FDA medical device regulations, and financial services requirements — providing quantitat...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730888 36stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI11%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic8%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access32%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References37 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,425✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,425
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730888
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (25 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Security Investment — Adversarial Attack Prevention

Posted on February 22, 2026March 1, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730508  63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI17%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed94%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References36 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,793✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,793
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730508
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Adversarial attacks represent a critical security threat to machine l[REDACTED]g systems, with global estimated losses reaching approximately $6 trillion in 2021—double the costs recorded in previous years. This article presents a comprehensive economic framework for evaluating security investments in adversarial attack prevention, analyzing the cost-benefit tradeoffs of defense mechanisms incl...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730508 63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI17%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed94%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References36 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,793✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,793
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18730508
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (70 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Scalability Costs in Enterprise AI Systems: Linear vs Exponential Growth Patterns

Posted on February 20, 2026February 20, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18709322  49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources13%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access54%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,263✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,263
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18709322
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams7✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 7
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Enterprise AI systems often encounter catastrophic cost overruns during scaling, with many organizations experiencing 300-800% budget increases when transitioning from pilot to production. This article analyzes the fundamental difference between linear and e[REDACTED]nential scalability costs in AI deployments, examining five critical cost components: compute infrastructure, data pipeline opera...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18709322 49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources13%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted54%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed25%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access54%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References24 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,263✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,263
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18709322
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams7✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 7
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

GPU Economics — Buy, Rent, or Serverless: A Decision Framework for AI Compute Procurement

Posted on February 19, 2026February 19, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18693701  48stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted59%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI46%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef10%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic56%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References39 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,599✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,599
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18693701
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (46 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The economics of GPU compute have become central to every serious AI investment discussion. As large language models, diffusion architectures, and deep l[REDACTED]g pipelines consume increasingly massive amounts of parallel compute, organizations face a fundamental procurement decision: buy dedicated hardware, rent on-demand capacity, or adopt serverless GPU abstractions that charge purely by e...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18693701 48stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted59%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI46%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef10%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic56%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References39 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,599✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,599
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18693701
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]3%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 3%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (46 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Cloud vs On-Premise Economics for AI: A Structured Cost Framework for Enterprise Decision-Making

Posted on February 18, 2026February 18, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18678386  49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources38%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted62%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef35%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access35%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,363✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,363
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18678386
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The deployment of artificial intelligence workloads involves one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions in modern enterprise technology strategy: whether to run AI systems in the cloud, on-premise, or across a hybrid topology. This decision is rarely reducible to a simple cost comparison — it involves hidden cost structures, risk transfer, organizational capability requirements, and...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18678386 49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources38%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted62%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI50%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef35%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access35%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,363✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,363
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18678386
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI Wage Premium Evidence: Measuring Productivity Uplift and Salary Effects in Knowledge Work
  • Sanctions Intelligence Automation: AI-Driven Screening at Scale Under EU and US Regimes
  • The Shadow IT AI Layer: Unauthorized Copilot and ChatGPT Usage in the Capability Gap
  • Readability and Conceptual Depth Metrics for AI Research Content: Beyond Flesch-Kincaid
  • Manufacturing AI Observability: Predictive Maintenance Explanation Quality

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

500+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.