Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Economic Vulnerability and Political Fragility: Are They the Same Crisis?

Posted on March 2, 2026March 2, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829103  42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI17%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic17%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access83%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References6 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,659✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,659
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Economic collapse and political fragility are often treated as symptoms of the same disease — the assumption being that when an economy fails, political violence follows inevitably. But the World Stability Intelligence (WSI) dataset, covering 87 countries across six regions, reveals a more nuanced picture. Some countries maintain remarkable political stability despite severe economic distress (...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829103 42stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI17%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic17%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access83%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References6 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,659✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,659
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

World Models: The Next AI Paradigm — Morning Review 2026-03-02

Posted on March 2, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829069  40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources7%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed29%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829069
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The artificial intelligence landscape is experiencing what may be its most consequential architectural inflection point since the transformer revolution of 2017. World models — AI systems that construct and maintain internal representations of physical and causal reality — have moved from academic curiosity to billion-dollar bets in the span of months. This morning review examines the theoretic...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829069 40stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources7%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed29%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic29%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18829069
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

World Stability Intelligence: Unifying Conflict Prediction and Geopolitical Risk into a Single Model

Posted on March 2, 2026March 2, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828896  38stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI8%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed23%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic23%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access62%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,931✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,931
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828896
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (29 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Two distinct analytical traditions have long operated in parallel without converging: conflict prediction — the binary question of whether armed violence will occur in a given country — and geopolitical risk assessment — the continuous measurement of how politically and economically unstable an environment is. Political scientists model the former; risk analysts calculate the latter. Yet both a...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828896 38stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted46%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI8%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed23%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic23%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access62%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,931✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,931
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828896
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (29 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Forecasting Political Risk: A Comparative Analysis of Time Series Prediction Methods

Posted on March 1, 2026March 10, 2026 by
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828738  41stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources25%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted44%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic38%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access31%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,690✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,690
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828738
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (34 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Predicting political risk is fundamentally different from economic forecasting — and the difference matters enormously for both policymakers and investors. Economic variables like GDP growth or inflation exhibit mean-reverting behaviour around structural trends; central banks provide forward guidance; quarterly revisions are orderly. Political risk, by contrast, is punctuated by discontinuities...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828738 41stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources25%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted44%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed13%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic38%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access31%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,690✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,690
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18828738
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (34 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

Model Benchmarking for Business — Beyond Academic Metrics

Posted on March 1, 2026March 13, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18827617  15stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access14%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,821✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,821
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18827617
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]27%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 27%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (5 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

Enterprise procurement of large language models (LLMs) continues to rely on academic benchmarks — MMLU, HumanEval, HellaSwag — that were designed for research comparisons rather than business decision-making. This article demonstrates why these metrics systematically mislead enterprise buyers and proposes the Business-Oriented Model Evaluation (BOME) framework, which centres on four operational...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18827617 15stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access14%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,821✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,821
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18827617
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]27%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 27%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (5 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

Multi-Cloud Strategy Economics: Arbitrage, Lock-In Costs, and AI Workload Optimization

Posted on March 1, 2026March 1, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821  27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted7%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic7%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,372✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,372
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Multi-cloud strategy has evolved from a risk-mitigation posture into a primary economic lever for enterprise AI operations. As generative AI workloads consume an increasing share of cloud budgets — projected at 10–15% of total cloud spend by 2030 according to Goldman Sachs research — the economic calculus of distributing workloads across AWS, Azure, and GCP has become significantly more complex...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821 27stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted7%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI7%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed7%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic7%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,372✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,372
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18825821
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (11 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

The Planning Illusion

Posted on March 1, 2026March 6, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824558  41stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic13%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References8 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,148✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,148
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824558
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (34 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

In my previous essay, "AI is not like us?", I argued that we systematically anthropomorphize AI systems — projecting human cognition onto what are, at their core, profoundly alien statistical machines. That argument was architectural and perceptual. This one is operational.

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824558 41stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI13%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic13%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References8 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,148✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,148
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824558
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]20%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 20%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (34 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

AI is not like us?

Posted on March 1, 2026March 1, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824472  48stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed42%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic46%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access54%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,938✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,938
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824472
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (46 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

When Alan Turing proposed his famous imitation game in 1950, he embedded a premise so deep we rarely surface it: that intelligence, to be valid, must be indistinguishable from human intelligence. Turing, 1950 — Computing Machinery and Intelligence. The test was never about capability. It was about resemblance.

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824472 48stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources12%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed42%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic46%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access54%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,938✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,938
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18824472
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]4%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 4%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (46 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

Autonomous Systems Economics: Replacing Human Labor with Compute

Posted on March 1, 2026March 1, 2026 by
Applied Research
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18822768  22stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted15%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic5%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,792✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,792
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18822768
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]24%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 24%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (13 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The fundamental economic question facing enterprises in 2026 is not whether autonomous systems can replace human labor, but when the compute-labor cost crossover makes replacement economically rational. This article examines the economics of autonomous system deployment across warehouse robotics, transportation, and knowledge work domains. Analysis of real-world implementations reveals that lab...

Show moreHide
Applied Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18822768 22stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted15%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI5%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic5%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access20%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,792✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,792
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18822768
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]24%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 24%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (13 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Cost-Effective Ent…Read More
Read more

AI Infrastructure Investment ROI — The Capex War Winners and Losers

Posted on March 1, 2026March 7, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329  39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted21%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI3%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed83%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access24%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References29 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,454✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,454
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The AI infrastructure investment cycle has reached unprecedented scale, with hyperscalers projected to spend over $600 billion in 2026—a 36% increase over 2025. This paper analyzes the economic fundamentals underlying this capital expenditure war, revealing a stark ROI crisis: AI data centers commissioned in 2025 face $40 billion in annual depreciation costs while generating only $15-20 billion...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329 39stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted21%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI3%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed83%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access24%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References29 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,454✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,454
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821329
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • …
  • 60
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Cost Spillover Effects: How AI Projects Reconfigure Internal R&D Budget Allocation
  • Carbon Ledger of AI Inference: Accounting for Emissions Across Distributed Computing Nodes
  • Hybrid Warfare Signal Intelligence: AI for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation in Critical Infrastructure
  • Semantic Coherence vs Plagiarism Thresholds: Automated Detection of Overlaps in AI-Written Content
  • AI Alignment Progress Report 2025: RLHF Successors and Constitutional AI Evaluation

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

590+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.