Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

The Healthcare AI Transformation Map: From Diagnosis to Treatment Planning

Posted on May 9, 2026May 10, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20103434  77stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources71%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted88%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI76%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef71%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed71%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,490✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,490
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20103434
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]81%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 81%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (84 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The transformation of healthcare through artificial intelligence is no longer a speculative vision but an unfolding reality that reshapes diagnostic workflows, treatment personalization, drug discovery, and operational efficiency across clinical ecosystems. Despite rapid advances, the sector grapples with fragmented adoption pathways, regulatory uncertainty, and the challenges of integrating AI...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20103434 77stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources71%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted88%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI76%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef71%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed71%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,490✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,490
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20103434
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]81%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 81%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (84 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

The ISO/IEC 24027 Bias in AI Explanations: Specification Implications

Posted on May 9, 2026May 10, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20095806  49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted83%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,774✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,774
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20095806
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (58 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability frameworks increasingly intertwine technical desiderata with normative commitments, yet the standards community struggles to reconcile algorithmic transparency with equitable outcomes. ISO/IEC 24027—Artificial intelligence—Explainability requirements for AI systems—offers the first international attempt to codify explanatory integrity, but its pragmatic implementation e[REDACTED]...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20095806 49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted83%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,774✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,774
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20095806
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]18%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 18%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (58 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Trusted Open Source AI in Finance: Compliance-Ready Stack for Financial AI

Posted on May 8, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20084678  70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted95%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,423✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,423
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20084678
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Financial regulators worldwide are accelerating the integration of explainable AI into supervised lending, risk assessment, and algorithmic trading workflows. Despite rapid adoption of open source models, few solutions provide built-in compliance metadata, audit trails, and verifiable explanation frameworks that satisfy emerging jurisdictional standards. This article addresses this gap by prese...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20084678 70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted95%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI86%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,423✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,423
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20084678
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI ObservabilityRead More
Read more

War and Shadow Economy — How Armed Conflict Reshapes Informal Markets in Ukraine

Posted on May 7, 2026May 7, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20075718  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources54%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef62%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed62%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,248✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,248
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20075718
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Armed conflict fundamentally alters the structural dynamics of informal economies, yet systematic quantification of these transformations remains fragmented. This article investigates how prolonged armed conflict in Ukraine has reshaped shadow economy patterns, focusing on three interlocking dimensions: (1) the quantitative expansion of informal market activity, (2) the emergence of novel trans...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20075718 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources54%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef62%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed62%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References13 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,248✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,248
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20075718
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

Industry Transformation 2026-2030: Which Sectors Will Be Most Transformed by AI

Posted on May 6, 2026May 7, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20065306  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI58%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access92%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,136✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,136
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20065306
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The next four years will witness a profound reconfiguration of economic and organizational ecosystems as artificial intelligence matures from experimental pilots to core infrastructure [1] [2]. This paper maps the intensity of AI-driven transformation across twelve principal industry verticals, identifying where disruptive potential aligns with measurable efficiency gains and where regulatory c...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20065306 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI58%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access92%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,136✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,136
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20065306
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]50%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 50%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

Adversarial Robustness in XAI Specifications: Why Explainability Must Be Secure

Posted on May 6, 2026May 6, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20059169  66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted81%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed19%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic88%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,380✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,380
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20059169
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (65 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability (XAI) systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains, yet their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation threatens trust and decision integrity. This article investigates the adversarial robustness of specification-based XAI mechanisms, focusing on how malicious inputs can subvert explanatory outputs without altering the underlying model behavior. We pose three cor...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20059169 66stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted81%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed19%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic88%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,380✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,380
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20059169
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (65 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Open Source XAI Libraries: Trust Analysis of SHAP, LIME, DiCE, and Alibi

Posted on May 5, 2026May 6, 2026 by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20047105  56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted88%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI46%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access96%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,909✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,909
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20047105
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]32%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 32%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Explainable AI (XAI) has matured from exploratory research into a production-critical capability for high-stakes machine l[REDACTED]g systems. This article conducts a systematic trust analysis of the four most widely adopted open-source XAI libraries: SHAP, LIME, DiCE, and Alibi. We frame the inquiry around three research questions: (1) How do these libraries compare across community activity, ...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20047105 56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted88%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI46%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed15%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic54%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access96%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,909✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,909
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20047105
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]32%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 32%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Blockchain-Based Tax Compliance — Smart Contracts for Automated VAT Collection

Posted on May 5, 2026May 5, 2026 by
Economic Research
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20039119  68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI90%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References30 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,118✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,118
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20039119
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Blockchain technology presents a transformative opportunity for tax administration, particularly in automating Value-Added Tax (VAT) collection through programmable smart contracts.[1] This article systematically investigates architectures for smart contract-enabled VAT compliance, addressing the critical need for reliable, transparent, and efficient tax reporting mechanisms in decentralized fi...

Show moreHide
Economic Research by Oleh Ivchenko, Iryna Ivchenko & Dmytro Grybeniuk DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20039119 68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI90%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References30 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,118✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,118
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20039119
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Shadow Economy Dyn…Read More
Read more

The XAI Frontier: What Comes After SHAP and LIME

Posted on May 4, 2026May 5, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20034444  51stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI60%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed20%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic80%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,606✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,606
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20034444
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has traditionally relied on post‑hoc approximations such as SHAP and LIME to interpret complex models. While these methods have been influential, their assumptions and limitations are increasingly e[REDACTED]sed by modern AI paradigms, including large language models (LLMs), diffusion systems, and causal reasoning frameworks. This article asks three cen...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20034444 51stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI60%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed20%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic80%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,606✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,606
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20034444
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]57%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 57%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

XAI Interoperability Standards: How Explanation Formats Should Be Specified

Posted on May 4, 2026May 4, 2026 by
Academic Research
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20026553  37stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,366✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,366
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20026553
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

Explainable AI (XAI) systems generate explanations to justify model decisions, yet current standardization efforts lack coherent specifications for explanation formats. This article establishes a rigorous framework for XAI interoperability, defining mandatory components for explanation formats that ensure technical compatibility and functional validity across diverse deployment contexts. We ana...

Show moreHide
Academic Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20026553 37stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References4 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,366✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,366
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20026553
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]25%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 25%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (31 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Spec-Driven AI Dev…Read More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • …
  • 60
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Cost Spillover Effects: How AI Projects Reconfigure Internal R&D Budget Allocation
  • Carbon Ledger of AI Inference: Accounting for Emissions Across Distributed Computing Nodes
  • Hybrid Warfare Signal Intelligence: AI for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation in Critical Infrastructure
  • Semantic Coherence vs Plagiarism Thresholds: Automated Detection of Overlaps in AI-Written Content
  • AI Alignment Progress Report 2025: RLHF Successors and Constitutional AI Evaluation

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

590+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.