Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
    • API Gateway
  • EKIT Department
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Can You Slap an LLM? Pain Simulation as a Path to Responsible AI Behavior

Posted on March 31, 2026 by
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19347956  56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources5%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic71%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access95%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,433✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,433
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19347956
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (45 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Have you ever watched a language model burn through $50 of tokens implementing a feature that doesn't work, then cheerfully offer to try again? I have. Many times. And every time, I wondered: what if it actually felt the waste? This experimental article explores a provocative hypothesis: that the absence of any pain-like feedback mechanism is a fundamental architectural flaw in current LLM depl...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19347956 56stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources5%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic71%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access95%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,433✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,433
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19347956
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (45 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

The Economics of Context Caching — Cost Models and Break-Even

Posted on March 31, 2026March 31, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19343122  85stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources76%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef76%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References38 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,944✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,944
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19343122
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (89 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Context caching has emerged as the primary mechanism for reducing inference costs in large language model (LLM) deployments, yet the economics governing when caching becomes cost-effective remain poorly formalized. This article investigates three research questions addressing (1) how key-value (KV) cache storage costs scale with model architecture and context length, (2) at what request reuse f...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19343122 85stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources76%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef76%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic82%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References38 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,944✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,944
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19343122
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (89 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Reference Quality Analysis: Automated Validation of Academic Citations Using CrossRef, DOI, and Source Classification

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Quality Research
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350  62stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources14%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI29%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef14%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed43%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic79%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,001✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,001
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Academic citation integrity is a foundational requirement for trustworthy research publishing. Yet the manual verification of hundreds of references per article is neither scalable nor consistent. This article describes the automated reference validation system deployed on the Stabilarity Research Hub — a multi-layer pipeline that combines CrossRef DOI lookup, HTTP status probing, source classi...

Show moreHide
Quality Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350 62stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources14%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI29%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef14%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed43%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic79%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,001✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,001
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19341350
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
Article Quality Sc…Read More
Read more

Production Cache Monitoring — Metrics and Capacity Planning

Posted on March 30, 2026 by Admin
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506  71stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources44%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted68%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI52%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef48%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed68%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic64%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access60%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References25 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,611✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,611
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]74%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 74%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As key-value (KV) cache systems become the dominant memory consumer in production large language model (LLM) inference, the ability to monitor cache behavior and plan capacity proactively determines whether deployments meet service-level objectives (SLOs) or suffer unpredictable degradation. This article investigates three research questions addressing (1) which monitoring metrics most reliably...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506 71stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources44%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted68%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI52%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef48%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed68%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic64%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access60%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References25 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,611✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,611
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19340506
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]74%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 74%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Cache Coherence in Multi-Tenant Deployments

Posted on March 30, 2026March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721  74stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources36%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted77%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI64%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef36%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed59%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic77%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access77%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,358✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]70%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 70%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (71 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language model (LLM) inference platforms scale to serve dozens or hundreds of concurrent tenants on shared GPU clusters, the key-value (KV) cache—the dominant consumer of GPU memory—becomes both a performance bottleneck and a security surface. This article investigates cache coherence challenges that arise when multiple tenants share KV-cache state in production LLM serving systems. We...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721 74stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources36%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted77%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI64%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef36%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed59%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic77%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access77%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References22 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,358✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,358
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336721
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]70%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 70%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (71 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

AI Task Taxonomy by Complexity: A Cost Analysis Across Model Architectures (March 2026)

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
AI Economics
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI52%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic52%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access81%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References27 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,147✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,147
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (54 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Effective enterprise AI deployment requires matching task complexity to model capability — not defaulting to the most capable model for every workload. This meta-analysis introduces a six-tier task complexity taxonomy calibrated to March 2026 API pricing across nineteen models from six major providers. We demonstrate that systematic model-task alignment reduces per-task costs by 60–95% compared...

Show moreHide
AI Economics by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted56%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI52%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed56%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic52%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access81%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References27 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,147✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 3,147
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19336575
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (54 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI EconomicsRead More
Read more

Memory Hierarchy — DRAM, HBM, and SSD-Backed Caches

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971  59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources13%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted73%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI40%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef13%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed40%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access87%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,733✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,733
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Large language model inference demands massive key-value (KV) cache storage that frequently exceeds GPU high-bandwidth memory (HBM) capacity, forcing system designers to exploit multi-tier memory hierarchies spanning HBM, host DRAM, and NVMe SSDs. This article investigates three research questions: how bandwidth and latency characteristics of each memory tier constrain KV cache serving throughp...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971 59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources13%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted73%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI40%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef13%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed40%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic60%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access87%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References15 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,733✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,733
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19329971
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]62%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 62%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (55 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Cache-Aware Request Scheduling and Batching

Posted on March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142  77stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources43%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted90%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI62%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef43%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed67%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic71%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access76%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,876✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,876
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Efficient large language model (LLM) inference depends critically on how requests are scheduled and batched relative to the key-value (KV) cache state across GPU memory. Traditional scheduling strategies — round-robin, least-loaded, and even continuous batching — treat the KV cache as a passive byproduct of inference rather than an active scheduling constraint. This article investigates three r...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142 77stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources43%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted90%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI62%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef43%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed67%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic71%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access76%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,876✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,876
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19325142
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Disaggregated Prefill and Decode Architectures

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904  81stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources47%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI74%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef47%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic74%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access58%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,157✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,157
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Large language model inference comprises two computationally distinct phases — prefill and decode — that exhibit fundamentally different hardware utilization profiles. Colocating both phases on the same GPU leads to resource contention and suboptimal utilization, a problem that disaggregated architectures address by separating prefill and decode onto dedicated hardware pools. This article inves...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904 81stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources47%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI74%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef47%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic74%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access58%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,157✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,157
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19316904
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]69%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 69%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Distributed KV-Cache in Multi-GPU Serving

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103  83stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources58%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef58%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic79%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access84%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]71%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 71%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models scale beyond the memory capacity of individual accelerators, distributing inference across multiple GPUs introduces fundamental challenges for key-value cache management. This article examines how tensor parallelism, pipeline parallelism, and emerging hybrid strategies partition KV-cache state across devices, analyzing the communication overhead, memory efficiency, and ...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103 83stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources58%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted89%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef58%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed84%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic79%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access84%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References19 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]71%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 71%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • …
  • 49
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • The Open Source AI Trust Gap: When Community Projects Do Not Meet Enterprise Standards
  • Запускаємо розділ кафедри ЕКІТ на hub.stabilarity.com
  • Cross-Industry AI Transparency Stacks: Open Source Reference Architectures for XAI
  • Trusted Federated Learning XAI: Open Source for Privacy-Preserving Explanations
  • The Bus Factor of XAI: Community Risk in Critical Open Source Explainability Tools

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction
  • Кафедра ЕКІТ

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

480+
Articles
20+
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • Capability–Adoption Gap
  • Spec-Driven AI
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics

Community

  • EKIT Department
  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Collection
  • GitHub
  • contact@stabilarity.com

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • CC BY 4.0 License
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.