Category: Trusted Open Source

Systematic evaluation of open-source projects through verified metrics — GitHub activity, community health, and industry impact. Data-driven rankings using reproducible methodology applied to the top repositories of 2026.

The Bus Factor of XAI: Community Risk in Critical Open Source Explainability Tools

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20410657  61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic88%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20410657
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]71%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 71%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability in artificial intelligence (AI) systems has become a pivotal concern for researchers, regulators, and practitioners seeking to deploy trustworthy AI solutions. While numerous frameworks and toolkits promise transparent model behavior, the sustainability of these open source initiatives often hinges on the concentration of maintainer resources—a modern manifestation of the classic...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20410657 61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic88%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,105✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,105
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20410657
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]71%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 71%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

License Implications for XAI Attribution: Legal Analysis of Open Source Explanation Dependencies

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20404245  59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted91%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic83%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,882✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,882
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20404245
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]70%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 70%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Abstract The rapid expansion of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) systems raises legal questions about the use of open source components in explanatory modules. This article investigates how open source licenses affect attribution requirements, copyleft obligations, and commercial deployment strategies. We formulate three research questions: (1) Which licenses impose attribution duties ...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20404245 59stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted91%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic83%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,882✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,882
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20404245
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]70%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 70%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams1✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 1
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (64 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Open Source AI in Government: Curated Trusted Stack for Public Sector AI

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20374059  67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI88%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,354✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,354
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20374059
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Government agencies are increasingly looking to artificial intelligence (AI) to modernize procurement workflows, strengthen fraud detection pipelines, and improve the delivery of public services while operating under tight budgetary constraints. Recent surveys reveal that more than 65 % of public‑sector technology officers consider open source AI components essential for achieving cost‑efficien...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20374059 67stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI88%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References26 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,354✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,354
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20374059
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]88%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 88%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

The Trusted MLOps Stack: Open Source Tools for Reproducible AI with Explanations

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20359688  52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI71%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed22%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access84%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References51 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,029✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,029
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20359688
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainability in artificial intelligence remains a critical barrier to adoption in safety‑critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems. While many commercial platforms tout built‑in interpretability, they often lock users into proprietary ecosystems and obscure the underlying model internals. This article presents a fully open source stack that enables reproducible, aud...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20359688 52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI71%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef4%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed22%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access84%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References51 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,029✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,029
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20359688
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]55%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 55%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (62 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Reproducibility in XAI Research: Open Source Benchmarks for Explanation Quality

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20318088  63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted96%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References27 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,257✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,257
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20318088
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]81%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 81%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (71 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Accurate and reproducible evaluation of explanation fidelity is essential for advancing XAI research. While several metrics have been proposed, no standardized benchmark framework exists that enables systematic comparison across methods. This article presents an open-source benchmark suite designed to assess explanation quality across multiple XAI techniques. Drawing on recent literature [1], w...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20318088 63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted96%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI89%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed4%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic93%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References27 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,257✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,257
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20318088
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]81%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 81%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (71 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Supply Chain Security in Open Source AI: Auditing XAI Tool Dependencies

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20274804  55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References32 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,769✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,769
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20274804
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]93%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 93%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The rapid adoption of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools within open sourceMachine L[REDACTED]g (ML) ecosystems has amplified concerns regarding supply chain security. While XAI techniques enhance model transparency, their integration often relies on third‑party libraries, data pipelines, and inference services that introduce hidden vulnerabilities. This article investigates the se...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20274804 55stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic91%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References32 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,769✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,769
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20274804
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]93%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 93%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Community Governance Models for Open Source AI Projects: What Makes XAI Projects Trustworthy

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20277714  34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,036✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,036
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20277714
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Open source artificial intelligence (AI) projects are increasingly shaping technological trajectories, yet their governance structures often remain opaque, undermining trustworthiness assessments. This article investigates how community-driven governance models affect the perceived trustworthiness of explainable AI (XAI) initiatives. We pose three research questions: (1) What governance models ...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20277714 34stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic40%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References5 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,036✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,036
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20277714
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]33%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 33%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Open Source LLM Explainability: Interpreting GPT, Llama, and Mistral Decisions

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20214595  13stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]0✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 0
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20214595
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (1 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)

\

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20214595 13stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]0✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 0
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20214595
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (1 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (0/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

Trusted Open Source AI in Healthcare: Curated Stack for Clinical AI

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20151156  70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef64%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed57%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access93%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,703✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,703
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20151156
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Open-source AI technologies are rapidly transforming healthcare, especially in clinical decision support (CDS) where timely, transparent, and auditable models are essential [1]. Despite this momentum, trust in open-source solutions remains fragmented due to limited standardized evaluation frameworks and provenance tracking [2]. To address these challenges, we introduce a curated stack that aggr...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20151156 70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted93%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI79%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef64%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed57%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic86%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access93%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,703✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,703
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20151156
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]77%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 77%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams2✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 2
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more

The Open Source XAI Ecosystem: Gaps, Opportunities, and Trusted Projects to Watch

Posted on by
Open Source Research
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20115253  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted84%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic81%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access89%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References37 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,239✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,239
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20115253
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has moved from niche academic curiosity to a cornerstone of responsible AI deployment in enterprises worldwide. Recent industry surveys indicate that 68% of Fortune 500 companies now require interpretability mechanisms for any production model, yet only 24% of open-source AI libraries provide robust, production-grade explanation tools (see [1], [2], [3]...

Show moreHide
Open Source Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20115253 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources3%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted84%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI78%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef3%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed5%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic81%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access89%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References37 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,239✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,239
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20115253
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]67%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 67%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Trusted Open SourceRead More
Read more