Category: Medical ML Diagnosis

ML for Medical Imaging Diagnosis

Ukrainian Healthcare System: Current Medical Imaging Practices

Posted on by
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752902  21stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,547✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,547
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752902
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (1 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Ukraine's healthcare system represents a unique case study in digital transformation under extraordinary circumstances. The two-level electronic healthcare system (EHS), with 36 million registered patients and 1.6 billion electronic medical records, provides a robust foundation for AI integration—despite wartime challenges that reduced viable Medical Information System (MIS) providers from 40 t...

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752902 21stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted0%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic0%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References2 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,547✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,547
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752902
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (1 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more
6-phase research framework for ML-augmented medical diagnosis

ML for Medical Diagnosis: Research Goals and Framework for Ukrainian Healthcare

Posted on by Admin
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752908  43stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources36%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI36%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed36%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic45%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]878✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 878
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752908
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

Launching a 12-week research program to build a practical framework for ML-augmented medical image diagnosis in Ukrainian healthcare. Article #1 establishes methodology, introduces Stabilarity Hub ecosystem, and outlines the path from research to ScanLab implementation.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752908 43stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources36%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI36%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef18%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed36%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic45%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access36%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]878✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 878
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752908
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more
Diagram showing how ML integrates into medical image analysis workflow from acquisition to diagnosis

Image Classification and ML in Disease Recognition: A Research Review

Posted on by Admin
Medical Research
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752910  52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources43%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI57%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef29%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed57%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic57%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access57%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,994✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,994
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752910
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

A comprehensive review of machine learning in medical image analysis, examining which ML techniques apply at each diagnostic stage, evidence-based best practices for doctor-AI collaboration, and unique conclusions on reducing diagnostic errors.

Show moreHide
Medical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752910 52stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources43%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI57%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef29%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed57%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic57%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access57%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,994✗Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 1,994
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18752910
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (2/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Medical ML DiagnosisRead More
Read more