Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
      • Open Starship
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
    • Article Evaluator
    • Open Starship Simulation
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Category: Intellectual Data Analysis

Data Mining Research by Iryna Ivchenko

Data Mining Chapter 5: Supervised Learning Taxonomy — Classification and Regression

Posted on February 12, 2026February 25, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18626630  81stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,293✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,293
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18626630
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (91 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This chapter presents a hierarchical taxonomy of supervised learning methods, organized along three primary dimensions: algorithmic architecture, learning mechanism, and model interpretability. We trace the evolutionary development from early statistical classifiers through decision tree families, neural architectures, kernel methods, and ensemble strategies. Special attention is given to the i...

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18626630 81stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access100%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References1 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,293✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,293
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18626630
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]100%✓≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 100%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (91 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Data Mining Chapter 4: Taxonomic Framework Overview — Classifying the Field

Posted on February 11, 2026February 15, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665633  49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed80%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access90%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References10 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,502✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,502
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665633
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

The proliferation of data mining techniques over the past three decades has created an urgent need for systematic organization and classification of methodological approaches. This chapter establishes a comprehensive meta-taxonomic framework for understanding, categorizing, and relating the diverse landscape of data mining methods. We propose a three-dimensional classification scheme that organ...

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665633 49stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted80%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed80%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access90%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References10 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,502✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,502
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665633
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams5✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 5
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Data Mining Chapter 2: Evolution of Data Mining Techniques (1960s-2000s)

Posted on February 11, 2026March 14, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749485  70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef83%✓≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,729✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,729
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749485
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]7%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This chapter chronicles the remarkable metamorphosis of data mining techniques across four transformative decades, from the pioneering expert systems of the 1960s to the sophisticated ensemble methods and standardized methodologies of the early 2000s. We trace the intellectual lineage from DENDRAL's rule-based reasoning through Quinlan's revolutionary decision tree algorithms, the renaissance o...

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749485 70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef83%✓≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,729✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,729
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749485
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]7%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (83 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Data Mining Chapter 3: The Modern Era — Big Data and Intelligent Mining

Posted on February 11, 2026March 1, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources42%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef67%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed58%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,898✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,898
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This chapter chronicles the revolutionary transformation of data mining during the big data era, spanning from Google's MapReduce paradigm in 2004 to the present age of intelligent, automated mining systems. We examine how the confluence of distributed computing, deep learning, and cloud infrastructure fundamentally redefined both the scale and sophistication of knowledge discovery from data. T...

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources42%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef67%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed58%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic100%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access42%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]5,898✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 5,898
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749487
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (86 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Data Mining Chapter 1: The Genesis of Data Mining — From Statistics to Discovery

Posted on February 11, 2026March 14, 2026 by
Data Science
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749494  70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,938✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,938
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749494
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This chapter traces the fascinating journey of data mining from its embryonic roots in 19th-century statistics to its crystallization as a formal discipline in the 1990s. We explore how Francis Galton's pioneering work on regression analysis and Karl Pearson's correlation coefficients laid the mathematical groundwork for pattern discovery. The narrative advances through the computational revolu...

Show moreHide
Data Science by Iryna Ivchenko & Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749494 70stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources50%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted100%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI100%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]4,938✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 4,938
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18749494
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]8%✗≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 8%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams6✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 6
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Intellectual Data …Read More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2

Recent Posts

  • Regulatory Observability: Meeting EU AI Act Article 13 Transparency Requirements
  • XAI Metrics for Production: Faithfulness, Clarity, and Stability in Deployed Models
  • Adversarial Explanation Attacks: When Users Manipulate AI by Exploiting Explanations
  • The Human-in-the-Loop Observability Stack: When Explanations Trigger Human Review
  • Legal AI Observability: Tracking Explanation Coherence in Contract Analysis

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.