Skip to content

Stabilarity Hub

Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • Medical ML Diagnosis
    • Enterprise & Economics
      • AI Economics
      • Cost-Effective AI
      • Spec-Driven AI
    • Geopolitics & Strategy
      • Anticipatory Intelligence
      • Future of AI
      • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
    • AI & Future Signals
      • Capability–Adoption Gap
      • AI Observability
      • AI Intelligence Architecture
      • AI Memory
      • Trusted Open Source
    • Data Science & Methods
      • HPF-P Framework
      • Intellectual Data Analysis
      • Reference Evaluation
    • Publications
      • External Publications
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Open Humanoid
    • Benchmarks & Measurement
      • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
      • Shadow Economy Dynamics
      • Article Quality Science
  • Tools
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
      • ScanLab
      • AI Data Readiness Assessment
    • Enterprise Strategy
      • AI Use Case Classifier
      • ROI Calculator
      • Risk Calculator
      • Reference Trust Analyzer
    • Portfolio & Analytics
      • HPF Portfolio Optimizer
      • Adoption Gap Monitor
      • Data Mining Method Selector
    • Geopolitics & Prediction
      • War Prediction Model
      • Ukraine Crisis Prediction
      • Gap Analyzer
      • Geopolitical Stability Dashboard
    • Technical & Observability
      • OTel AI Inspector
    • Robotics & Engineering
      • Humanoid Simulation
    • Benchmarks
      • UIB Benchmark Tool
  • API Gateway
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Join Community
  • Terms of Service
  • Login
  • Register
Menu

Category: AI Memory

Research series on AI memory systems — KV-cache, context windows, attention memory, retrieval-augmented memory, and memory-efficient inference architectures

Distributed KV-Cache in Multi-GPU Serving

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103  75stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources65%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef65%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed65%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic47%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models scale beyond the memory capacity of individual accelerators, distributing inference across multiple GPUs introduces fundamental challenges for key-value cache management. This article examines how tensor parallelism, pipeline parallelism, and emerging hybrid strategies partition KV-cache state across devices, analyzing the communication overhead, memory efficiency, and ...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103 75stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources65%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted65%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI82%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef65%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed65%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic47%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access47%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,267✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,267
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19310103
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]86%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 86%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Flash Attention’s Role in Memory-Efficient Inference

Posted on March 29, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451  68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef55%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

Flash Attention has become the foundational kernel technology enabling memory-efficient inference in large language models (LLMs), transforming how attention computation interacts with GPU memory hierarchies. This article investigates three research questions: (1) how does Flash Attention's tiling strategy reduce peak memory consumption compared to standard attention, and what are the theoretic...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451 68stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources55%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted55%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI75%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef55%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed50%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access45%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,893✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,893
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19303451
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (60 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Sliding Window and Compressive Caching for Infinite Context

Posted on March 28, 2026March 30, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498  61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI83%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef26%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed35%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic22%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access30%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,250✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,250
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (49 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models (LLMs) scale to context windows exceeding one million tokens, the key-value (KV) cache grows linearly and becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during autoregressive inference. Sliding window attention and compressive caching represent two complementary families of techniques that bound memory usage while preserving access to long-range context. This article investigat...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498 61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources26%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI83%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef26%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed35%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic22%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access30%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References23 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,250✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,250
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19299498
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]80%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 80%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (49 × 60%) + Required (4/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Cross-Layer KV-Cache Sharing

Posted on March 28, 2026March 29, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014  54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed30%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]76%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 76%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)

As large language models (LLMs) scale to billions of parameters and context windows stretch beyond 128K tokens, the key-value (KV) cache becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during inference. Cross-layer KV-cache sharing represents a family of techniques that exploit redundancy in key and value representations across transformer layers to reduce cache memory without retraining. This article i...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014 54stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources15%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted35%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI85%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef15%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed30%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic15%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access25%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References20 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,141✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,141
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19291014
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]76%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 76%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (47 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (3/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Token Pruning and Attention Sparsity

Posted on March 28, 2026March 28, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070  72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources75%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access88%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]92%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 92%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

This article investigates token pruning and attention sparsity as complementary strategies for reducing KV-cache memory consumption during large language model inference. Building on our series analysis of semantic prompt caching, we examine how selective token removal and sparse attention patterns can achieve 50-80% memory reduction while preserving generation quality. Three research questions...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070 72stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources75%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI81%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef75%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed75%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic75%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access88%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,298✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,298
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19269070
[o]ORCID [REQ]✗✗Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]92%✓≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 92%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code✓✓Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (82 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Semantic Prompt Caching — Beyond Exact Match

Posted on March 24, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19211071  63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted91%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI9%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic73%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access91%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,328✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,328
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19211071
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Prompt caching has emerged as a critical optimization for large language model (LLM) serving, yet production systems overwhelmingly rely on exact-match strategies that miss semantically equivalent queries. This article investigates semantic prompt caching — systems that identify and serve cached responses for semantically similar (but not identical) prompts using embedding-based similarity dete...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19211071 63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted91%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI9%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic73%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access91%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References11 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,328✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,328
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19211071
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]0%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (66 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Speculative Decoding and Cache Reuse

Posted on March 24, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19210815  63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic83%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,662✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,662
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19210815
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]13%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 13%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (67 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

Speculative decoding has emerged as a transformative inference optimization that breaks the sequential bottleneck of autoregressive generation by drafting multiple tokens in parallel and verifying them in a single forward pass. This article examines three research questions at the intersection of speculative decoding and KV cache management: how draft-then-verify architectures interact with cac...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19210815 63stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic83%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access94%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,662✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,662
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19210815
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]13%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 13%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (67 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Grouped-Query Attention — Cache-Efficient Architecture Design

Posted on March 24, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19209159  69stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources5%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted95%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI90%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed90%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access19%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,403✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,403
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19209159
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]42%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 42%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

As large language models scale beyond hundreds of billions of parameters and context windows extend to millions of tokens, the key-value (KV) cache required for attention computation becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during inference. Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) addresses this by allowing multiple query heads to share fewer key-value heads, reducing cache footprint while preserving model...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19209159 69stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources5%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted95%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI90%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef5%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed90%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic10%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access19%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References21 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,403✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,403
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19209159
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]42%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 42%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (76 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Paged Attention and Virtual Memory for LLM Inference

Posted on March 24, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19203099  61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources17%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed92%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,912✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,912
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19203099
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

As large language models scale to billions of parameters and millions of context tokens, the key-value (KV) cache that stores attention states becomes the dominant memory bottleneck during inference. Traditional contiguous memory allocation for KV caches leads to severe fragmentation — wasting 40-60% of available GPU memory — and fundamentally limits serving throughput. This article investigate...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19203099 61stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources17%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted75%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed92%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,912✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,912
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19203099
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]40%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 40%
[c]Data Charts4✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 4
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (63 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Meta-Analysis of Context Benchmarks — Building a Unified Evaluation Framework

Posted on March 24, 2026 by
Technical Research
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19199439  64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources19%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic81%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access75%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,526✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,526
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19199439
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]14%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 14%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)

The rapid expansion of context windows — from 4K tokens to 10M tokens in models like Llama 4 — has produced a proliferation of evaluation benchmarks, yet no unified framework exists for comparing long-context capabilities across these disparate tests. This article presents a meta-analysis of ten major context benchmarks (NIAH, RULER, LongBench v2, InfiniteBench, BABILong, NoLiMa, LongGenBench, ...

Show moreHide
Technical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19199439 64stabilfr·wdophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources19%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI6%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed100%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic81%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access75%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,526✓Minimum 2,000 words for a full research article. Current: 2,526
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19199439
[o]ORCID [REQ]✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed [REQ]—✗Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness [REQ]14%✗≥80% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 14%
[c]Data Charts5✓Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 5
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (3/5 × 30%) + Optional (2/4 × 10%)
AI MemoryRead More
Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Comparative Benchmarking: HPF-P vs Traditional Portfolio Methods
  • The Future of Intelligence Measurement: A 10-Year Projection
  • All-You-Can-Eat Agentic AI: The Economics of Unlimited Licensing in an Era of Non-Deterministic Costs
  • The Future of AI Memory — From Fixed Windows to Persistent State
  • FLAI & GROMUS Mathematical Glossary: Complete Variable Reference for Social Media Trend Prediction Models

Research Index

Browse all articles — filter by score, badges, views, series →

Categories

  • ai
  • AI Economics
  • AI Memory
  • AI Observability & Monitoring
  • AI Portfolio Optimisation
  • Ancient IT History
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Article Quality Science
  • Capability-Adoption Gap
  • Cost-Effective Enterprise AI
  • Future of AI
  • Geopolitical Risk Intelligence
  • hackathon
  • healthcare
  • HPF-P Framework
  • innovation
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • medai
  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Open Humanoid
  • Research
  • ScanLab
  • Shadow Economy Dynamics
  • Spec-Driven AI Development
  • Technology
  • Trusted Open Source
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Intelligence Benchmark
  • War Prediction

About

Stabilarity Research Hub is dedicated to advancing the frontiers of AI, from Medical ML to Anticipatory Intelligence. Our mission is to build robust and efficient AI systems for a safer future.

Language

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • 🔑 API for Researchers

Connect

Facebook Group: Join

Telegram: @Y0man

Email: contact@stabilarity.com

© 2026 Stabilarity Research Hub

© 2026 Stabilarity Hub | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme
Stabilarity Research Hub

Open research platform for AI, machine learning, and enterprise technology. All articles are preprints with DOI registration via Zenodo.

185+
Articles
8
Series
DOI
Archived

Research Series

  • Medical ML Diagnosis
  • Anticipatory Intelligence
  • Intellectual Data Analysis
  • AI Economics
  • Cost-Effective AI
  • Spec-Driven AI

Community

  • Join Community
  • MedAI Hack
  • Zenodo Archive
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Contact
Operated by
Stabilarity OÜ
Registry: 17150040
Estonian Business Register →
© 2026 Stabilarity OÜ. Content licensed under CC BY 4.0
Terms About Contact
Language: 🇬🇧 EN 🇺🇦 UK 🇩🇪 DE 🇵🇱 PL 🇫🇷 FR
Display Settings
Theme
Light
Dark
Auto
Width
Default
Column
Wide
Text 100%

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Terms of Service for more information.