Author: Admin

When the Economy Collapses, the Government Follows: Mapping the Dependency Between Economic and Political Instability

Posted on by Admin
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972765  59stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources22%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef22%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic33%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access78%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,170✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,170
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]10✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 10
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972765
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness0%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (44 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

Venezuela's GDP contracted by more than 80 percent between 2013 and 2021 — one of the largest peacetime economic collapses ever recorded. Its political system, meanwhile, had not yet fully collapsed when the economy began its descent. The government survived by concentrating power, suppressing opposition, and externalizing blame. But the sequence is unmistakable: the economy fell first, and pol...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972765 59stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources22%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI33%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef22%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic33%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access78%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References9 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,170✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,170
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]10✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 10
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972765
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness0%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (44 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

The World Is Less Violent Than in 2000. It Is Also Less Stable. Here Is Why.

Posted on by Admin
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972000  53stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources17%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,975✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,975
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]9✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 9
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972000
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness17%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 17%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (33 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

The conflict proxy score — our model's aggregate measure of active armed conflict intensity across 87 countries — has fallen from 6.85 in 2000 to 5.20 in 2023. That is a 24% decline over 23 years. By the oldest and most intuitive measure of global danger, the world is meaningfully safer than it was at the turn of the millennium.

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972000 53stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources17%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted50%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI25%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef8%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic25%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References12 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,975✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,975
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]9✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 9
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18972000
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness17%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 17%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (33 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

The Confidence Gate Theorem: A Framework That Promises More Than It Proves

Posted on by Admin
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18971752  63stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef33%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References6 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,508✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,508
[u]Original [REQ]99%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 99% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]6✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 6
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18971752
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness29%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 29%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)

Ronald Doku's "The Confidence Gate Theorem: When Should Ranked Decision Systems Abstain?" (arXiv:2603.09947, March 2026) addresses a practical but undertheorized problem: in ranked decision systems — recommenders, ad auctions, clinical triage — when does it help to withhold a prediction rather than fire it? Doku proposes two formal conditions — rank-alignment and absence of inversion zones — un...

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18971752 63stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted67%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI67%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef33%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed0%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic67%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access67%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References6 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,508✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,508
[u]Original [REQ]99%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 99% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]6✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 6
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18971752
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness29%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 29%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (53 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

The Algorithm That Watches the World Fall Apart

Posted on by Admin
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968959  51stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed43%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic43%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,366✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,366
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]5✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 5
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968959
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness0%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)

This article describes the development and deployment of the World Stability Intelligence (WSI) system — a machine l[REDACTED]g-driven geopolitical risk monitoring platform that continuously tracks 87 countries across three risk dimensions: war risk (45%), political risk (35%), and economic risk (20%). Drawing on an ML-enhanced heuristic prediction framework (HPF-P), the system generates normal...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968959 51stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted43%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI0%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed43%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic43%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access86%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References7 refs○Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,366✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,366
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]5✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 5
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968959
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness0%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 0%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (32 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more

When Your Research Gets Cited on Medium: A Clarification, a Thank You, and Why AGI Is Closer Than the Pessimists Think

Posted on by Admin
Journal Commentary
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968176  60stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources10%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed60%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References10 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,510✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,510
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968176
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness42%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 42%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)

A personal commentary on an unexpected Medium citation of research on AI infrastructure ROI. Clarifying the nuance between measured economic analysis and pessimistic interpretations, with a reflection on AGI proximity and a thank you to the author who sparked the conversation.

Show moreHide
Journal Commentary by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968176 60stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources10%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted60%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI20%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed60%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic50%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access70%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References10 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,510✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,510
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18968176
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness42%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 42%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams0○Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 0
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (48 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/7 × 10%)
Future of AIRead More
Read more

From a Destroyed City to a Research Hub: The Story Behind Stabilarity

Posted on by Admin
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18930087  51stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted38%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic19%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,117✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,117
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18930087
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness23%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 23%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (30 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

The story starts in a classroom, as most research stories do — though this particular classroom was unofficial. Around 2019, Oleh Ivchenko began running supplementary IT courses at Odessa National Polytechnic University. Not because the institution asked him to, but because the gap between what students were being taught and what the industry actually needed had become too large to ignore. He r...

Show moreHide
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18930087 51stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted38%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI19%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed31%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic19%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access63%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References16 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,117✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,117
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18930087
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness23%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 23%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (30 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Read More
Read more

Longitudinal Report Generation with LLM-Based Agents: Architecture, Consistency Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidence

Posted on by Admin
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928461  76stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access92%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References25 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,190✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 3,190
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]22✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 22
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928461
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness38%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 38%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

Large language model (LLM) based agents are increasingly deployed as autonomous report-generation systems — producing research summaries, analytical outputs, and monitoring digests across extended time horizons without continuous human supervision. This paper examines the fundamental challenges of longitudinal consistency in such systems: context window exhaustion, semantic drift, hallucination...

Show moreHide
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928461 76stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources4%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted92%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI92%✓≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef16%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed8%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic92%✓≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access92%✓≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References25 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]3,190✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 3,190
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]22✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 22
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928461
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness38%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 38%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (72 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Read More
Read more

Beyond the Benchmark: What AI Looks Like When It Actually Works

Posted on by Admin
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18926904  74stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI61%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed61%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic61%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access56%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,301✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,301
[u]Original [REQ]99%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 99% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]12✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 12
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18926904
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness31%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 31%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

The most consequential question in applied artificial intelligence is not whether a model achieves state-of-the-art on a leaderboard. It is whether the model does something useful when connected to reality — to messy data, constrained infrastructure, and users who need answers rather than probabilities. This article examines what AI actually looks like when it crosses that boundary. Drawing on ...

Show moreHide
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18926904 74stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources33%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted78%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI61%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef17%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed61%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic61%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access56%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References18 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,301✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,301
[u]Original [REQ]99%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 99% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]12✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 12
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18926904
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness31%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 31%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (68 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Read More
Read more

Stabilarity Research Platform Is Now Open — Free API Access for All Researchers

Posted on by Admin
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928330  74stabilfr·wuedcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources35%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI41%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef24%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed82%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic41%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access65%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,790✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,790
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928330
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)

This paper presents the Stabilarity Research Platform — an open, API-accessible research infrastructure exposing validated machine learning models, geopolitical risk datasets, and decision optimization tools to the global research community at no cost. The platform implements FAIR data principles (Wilkinson et al., 2016), providing composable, versioned endpoints for: (1) medical imaging classi...

Show moreHide
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928330 74stabilfr·wuedcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources35%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted94%✓≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI41%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef24%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed82%✓≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic41%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access65%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References17 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]1,790✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 1,790
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]7✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 7
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18928330
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams3✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 3
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (69 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (1/4 × 10%)
Read More
Read more

Survival as a Strategy: Ukraine’s AI Trajectory in War and Peace

Posted on by Admin
Geopolitical Research
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko  ·  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813  54stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,211✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,211
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]12✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 12
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness7%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)

We can already observe the development and implementation of artificial intelligence in various spheres of human activity. And, strange as it may seem, Ukraine's success in using advanced technologies, particularly in the military sphere, is logically and predictably driven by its need to survive in a challenging war against a powerful adversary. While the use of artificial intelligence in othe...

Show moreHide
Geopolitical Research by Oleh Ivchenko DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813 54stabilfr·wuedophcgmx
BadgeMetricValueStatusDescription
[s]Reviewed Sources0%○≥80% from editorially reviewed sources
[t]Trusted71%○≥80% from verified, high-quality sources
[a]DOI14%○≥80% have a Digital Object Identifier
[b]CrossRef0%○≥80% indexed in CrossRef
[i]Indexed14%○≥80% have metadata indexed
[l]Academic14%○≥80% from journals/conferences/preprints
[f]Free Access50%○≥80% are freely accessible
[r]References14 refs✓Minimum 10 references required
[w]Words [REQ]2,211✓Minimum 1,000 words of article body. Current: 2,211
[u]Original [REQ]100%✓≥85% unique sentences (no padding or repeated blocks) and no leaked drafting notes. Current: 100% unique
[e]Evidence [REQ]12✓Cites at least 1 external source(s): links, DOIs or a reference list. Current: 12
[d]DOI [REQ]✓✓Zenodo DOI registered for persistent citation. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18896813
[o]ORCID✓✓Author ORCID verified for academic identity
[p]Peer Reviewed—○Peer reviewed by an assigned reviewer
[h]Freshness7%○≥60% of references from 2025–2026. Current: 7%
[c]Data Charts0○Original data charts from reproducible analysis (min 2). Current: 0
[g]Code—○Source code available on GitHub
[m]Diagrams4✓Mermaid architecture/flow diagrams. Current: 4
[x]Cited by0○Referenced by 0 other hub article(s)
Score = Ref Trust (35 × 60%) + Required (4/4 × 30%) + Optional (2/7 × 10%)
Geopolitical RiskRead More
Read more